Rioters throw back tear-gas canisters fired by federal law-enforcement officers in Portland, Ore., July 29, 2020. (Caitlin Ochs/Reuters)
Please read the interview between National Review’s Michael Brandon Dougherty (a man of the right) and Michael Tracey ( a left-leaning independent journalist) found here.
Michael Brandon DoughertyMichael Tracey
What you have been reading and viewing in mainstream media about our current urban disorders is a sham. It is the duty of the responsible citizen to ferret out fact from fiction, there being much to filter and uncover. The needs of our current moment require something more than quips on Facebook.
A party line was evident since the disturbances first erupted in our cities a couple of months ago. The Democratic Party line is to characterize the events as “peaceful protests”, with emphasis on “peaceful”. Jerry Nadler (D, NY), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, went so far as to characterize contrary reports of violence as a “myth that’s being spread only in Washington DC.” The word “peaceful” is ubiquitously attached to “protest” in Dem Party circles and throughout much of our biased legacy media: CNN, MSNBC, the networks, and big city urban dailies like the NYT and WaPo. But is it true?
No, no, no! Tracey went across the country reporting on the events. He didn’t find “peaceful protests”. He discovered something that can only be described as an insurrection. While ostensibly the “protests” started as an outcry against racism, at the tip of the spear were white middle-class urban twenty-somethings, and the victims were overwhelmingly minorities, many black. Far from there being only marches and speeches, Tracey discovered a bombed-out, boarded-up, and vandalized urban landscape stretching for blocks, a hulking mass of dystopia.
A portion of downtown Minneapolis after the riots.
Portland he describes as “unique”. It has been in a permanent state rebellion for years. So, why are the Democrats so keen on hiding the truth about Portland, et al? One answer: politics! Since the election of Trump, the “Resistance” became the “Movement”, not that there’s much difference between the two. The “Movement” encompasses more than the armed militia of the Democratic Party on the streets of Portland – BLM, Antifa, and other muscular utopians – but also the cores of our major cultural institutions. Aleksander Solzhenitsyn’s account of Russia at the dawn of revolution depicts a similar malign disorientation. The threat is real and broad based.
Louis Vitton store front, downtown Portland, May 29.
We are facing a real revolutionary march down the well-traveled road of the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror and the Bolshevik’s Red Terror. This will not end in a pretty place if allowed to fester and grow. The American people will have to steel themselves against an onslaught of misinformation meant to advance a huge totalitarian-like power grab. So, please read.
Priest and landlord condemned before a Red Tribunal during the Bolshevik Red Terror..
Undated photo inside the original wooden memorial at Choeung Ek. We see the remains of the victims of the Khmer Rouge.
From the politicization of science to further a centrally planned future in grand schemes like the Green New Deal to the New York Times’s “The 1619 Project” refashioning of our self-identity as a nation to fit the leftists’ prefabricated, all-purpose explanation for western civilization and America, we are getting very close to the Khmer Rouge’s Year Zero as frighteningly displayed in 1984’s “The Killings Fields”. Maybe you have heard of Democratic Party politicians (most recently at the Barr hearings before the House Judiciary Committee) and left wing activist academics claiming that you are a racist because of the race of your supporting staff or for making the simple truism that all lives matter. We have seen pastors leading their congregations in groveling acts of submission or confession of sins for which there is no sinful act. In fact, your melanin count alone is enough to condemn you. The radical dogma has penetrated the universities, teacher colleges, your child’s classroom, and Big Sports. It’s everywhere.
White citizens and police officers wash feet of black leaders, ask for forgiveness in Gary, NC, June 7.
It’s an eerie world, and it’s descending on us very rapidly. The Democratic Party is the revolutionary party for this new totalitarianism. The revolution isn’t solely on the streets of Portland, et al. It’s appearing on your ballot in November 2020.
The Killing Fields clip below was one of a few that I would use in my World History class to introduce students to the real nature of 20th century totalitarianism. Of particular note is the dismantlement of the family in the camp’s school scene. A signature doctrine of BLM also belonged to the Khmer Rouge. Key to constructing the utopia is mind control (the radicalized curriculums) and supplanting memory (statue toppling and the imposition of their “History”) in order to mold the minds of the people so they will better fit into their new world order. Please watch the minute and a half clip for it could be in your and your children’s future.
Leaders of United Teachers Los Angeles said Monday (June 8) they support a movement to eliminate the Los Angeles School Police Department, a force of about 400 that serves the L.A. Unified School District , Incoming UTLA president Cecily Myart-Cruz said, “We have to dismantle white supremacy.”
I was a teachers union local president. I know what teachers unions are all about. They are about maximizing rewards for their members, not students, as they push lefty curriculum. Circa 2020, they want to keep the schools closed, their full pay for “distance” instruction, with as few work hours as possible, and no accountability. Plus, plus, this from the microphone of incoming United Teachers of Los Angeles (UTLA) president, Cecily Myart-Cruz: they are all-in for defunding police, the district’s campus police that is. UTLA is a combination of CHAZ (of Seattle fame) and La Costra Nostra. Give them what they want or they will extort the education of your children.
The prospect of more loosey-goosey “distance” learning is driving more parents to abandon the public schools. Some are turning to self-help by forming learning pods for their children. They might even learn that they don’t need Myart-Cruz and her UTLA cohorts.
When schools reopen, and they will have to reopen – probably after the Biden/AOC regime wins the White House – these teachers might wake up to fewer kids in the classroom. With budgets crimped by the lockdowns, and ADA numbers falling, many of those teachers in the photo might be looking for barista jobs. My guess: math and economics won’t show up in the college transcripts of the pink-slipped.
UTLA, CTA, and NEA are to the education industry what the UAW was to the American auto industry by the end of the 20th century. Sometimes, poison is self-administered.
One thing that I told my sons when they were younger was that the adolescent’s lack of self-control and impulsive judgment when possessed by an adult can lead to a life in and out of the criminal justice system. Now fuel that impetuousness with an enthusiasm for new ideas that aren’t new. Many of the notions have deeply troubled histories, unbeknownst to the excited zealot. So, pile ignorance on top of rashness. Now we have quite the noxious brew of a personality. Have I accurately described the malicious clowns laying waste to the city centers around the country?
Maybe add pampered to the list of personality traits of the miscreants who are pillaging our public squares. Here’s the cartoonist Michael Ramirez’s succinct portrayal that does a better job in making the point.
The Great Skedaddle, July 1861. Union troops flee in panic from the Bull Run battlefield and won’t stop till they get to Washington, DC.The Great Skedaddle II.
This is something to drive our steel pipe, hand laser, and match wielding rioter/protester into shrieks of hysterical comparisons with the Wehrmacht conquest of Europe … for the halfwit semi-literate on our college campuses capable of making the comparison. In July of 1861, Union forces in their first major confrontation with Southern troops fled in a panic from the battlefield on Bull Run Creek all the way back to Washington, DC. It was called The Great Skedaddle. A similar Skedaddle is taking place as many are fleeing the violence and totalitarianism on the west coast for the safer environs of the mountain time zone.
The evidence of it is all around, especially if you live in the epicenter of the destination of the teeming hordes, as I do. My sons are trying to buy a house in our corner of the country and are facing a feverish market. Real estate agents, based on the statements of buyers, say it’s due to the rampaging disorder and totalitarian shutdowns throughout the Pacific time zone. Yes, low interest rates play a role, but they say that an unusually high spike is occurring right now. It seems that freedom and safety have a quality all their own.
The prevalence of the totalitarian shutdowns is indeed taking a toll. Many in the market say that the shutdowns and particularly the school closings have lasted way too long. The prospect of their kids falling further behind by the mandated “distance learning” is intolerable. In contrast, Hellgate School District in the Missoula area has announced a full-open of 5-day in-person instruction in the fall, with an in-home option. Try that in California as sunshine state dwellers face the opposition of the teacher and public employee unions and the trendy and despotic cultural leftism in Sacramento. Good luck with that.
Many have mentioned the blue/red divide in the country. Me too. We are sorting each other out by belief and geography. But its more than that now. The current atmosphere has taken on the character of a panicked flight for safety. The more accurate dichotomy might be blue/sanctuary (by “sanctuary” I don’t mean the silly boilerplate used to disguise the effort to nullify federal immigration law). More and more people see the pyrotechnics, beatings, shootings, shuttered businesses, and empty schools as a Mad Max movie set that they happen to live in. So, for many, off to the next time zone over.
Is it time to pack up and head East? Some small companies in Southern California are moving logistics operations to Texas and other neighboring states to reduce overhead. (iStockphoto)
As a refugee myself, I understand. I have a greater appreciation for the predicament of the Sonoran resident fleeing the cartels. And, now, so do the nervous denizens of Seattle-to-LA. Welcome to The Great Skedaddle II.
Someone adds fuel to a fire set in downtown Portland during protests on Friday, May 29, 2020, in downtown Portland. (photo: Mark Graves/The Oregonian)
People wonder where we got the screaming college students who demand the immediate surrender to their opinions by everyone. People also might wonder where we got the roaming gangs of radical left twenty-somethings who claim the wisdom to pass judgment on centuries-old personages not advantaged from sitting at the feet of narrowly doctrinaire professors like they did. Seldom can it be said that fanatics are born. They are bred in the culture, family, and schools. Probably, the first two set the stage for the influence of the third.
Then these twisted minds filter out into corporate boardrooms, the professions, media, and teaching positions to perpetuate the cycle. I was reminded of the phenomena after reading a back issue of National Geographic Magazine from December 2018.
After the first four articles, I began to wonder whether I was reading “Mother Jones Magazine” under another title. They amounted to a single op-ed for bigger-getting-bigger government of the international variety, of cultural left agitprop, socialist redistribution, and the lionization of a once honorable activist who descended into rank partisanship (John Lewis, D, Md.). The National Geographic Society has been absorbed into collectivism’s Borg.
One common technique in the arsenal of today’s Left is “branding”. Subsuming totalitarianism under a catchy phrase – or “brand” – frequently does the trick. For example, the conservative-looking President and CEO of the National Geographic Society, Tracy Wolstencroft, opined on the need for a “Planet in Balance”. What does that mean? I’ll tell you what it means: it means Control, control of the mind and everything else through government power.
Tracy Wolstencroft
It’s the same old ploy first pushed by Stanford’s great gift to the cause, Paul Ehrlich and his “The Population Bomb”. First Ehrlich postulates X number of people and Y number of resources and, voilà, we have disaster – unless we adopt Ehrlich’s tome to replace the Bible, erect a plethora of government carrots and sticks, and implement mammoth brainwashing in the schools-turned-reeducation-camps.
Wolstencroft goes through the trite litany of the usual suspects of overpopulation, apocalyptic climate change, and no more tigers, et al, and we arrive at the all-too-familiar ground of environmental totalitarianism. His unacknowledged eco-socialism, like all socialisms, has an alluring fetish for eco-totalitarianism. Of course, Wolstencroft’s gazillions earned in the securities industry will insulate him from the consequences of his beliefs while everyone else enters the new normal of personal malaise common to all socialisms. His kids will be okay; as for everyone else’s …?
Following Wolstencrofts’ sermon was chief editor Susan Goldberg’s softball interview of John Lewis in a piece titled “We Can Lay Down the Burden of Race”. Au contraire, Lewis can hardly put it down. He has spent a lifetime in the fever swamps of race politics. For Lewis, it’s Jim Crow and 1955 Montgomery, Alabama, forever.
John Lewis
He makes much of the Charlottesville “riot” (2017) but was dismissive of the rioting and looting in Ferguson, Mo., (2014). He called for an end to the violence in Minneapolis (2020), to his credit, but couldn’t avoid the society-wide “justice denied” mantra for which he clung till his last breath. He didn’t seem too concerned for the rights of property owners (black or white), the right to self-defense (black or white), the right to equal protection for Asians and “whites” in college admissions, while advancing the cause of other nations’ citizens who happen to be in our country in violation of our laws: an odd stance for someone who claimed to be a stalwart of justice for African-Americans as he ironically pushed the interests of another group (the “undocumented”) to the detriment of his own.
He just couldn’t let go of the race thing when he said, “… the scars and stings of racism are still deeply embedded in our society ….” He never wanted to get rid of it and kept moving the goal posts to retain its usefulness as a whipping boy. He’s like Christopher Reeves who couldn’t shed the stereotype of Superman. Lewis rose to fame fighting Jim Crow and he would forever claim its presence, even when the nation did all it could to eradicate it. Unlike Reeves, though, Lewis reveled in his race-baiting persona and rode it to fame and a career in politics.
There was no pushback by our stalwart (?) member of the fourth estate, Susan Goldberg.
The socialism line was front and center in the next piece on the Inupiat people of Alaska. A frequently repeated angle in the story was the tendency of the glorious Inupiat people to equally share the proceeds of the glorious hunt. All well and good for a small tribe wishing to remain the same, except they weren’t … remaining the same, that is. These folks weren’t wearing animal skins and possessed weapons and tools that didn’t come from the bones of the bowhead whale, the tools and weapons of choice for their ancestors. The outfit of an Inupiat hunter pictured in the article belied the impression of an indigenous people at one with nature. The rifle slung over the shoulder came from one of those factories belching pollution and exploiting hundreds of wage slaves in a scheme to bilk unearned profits from the masses, or so the young writer might have written if he wasn’t so enamored with patronizing another non-white colonized people (using the lingo of the “social justice warrior”).
Inupiaq Eskimo hunters carry a rifle and walking stick while walking over the shore ice along the Chukchi Sea, Barrow, Alaska. (photo: Design Pics Inc/Alamy)
To be honest, the depiction was one of manifest incongruency. Some association with capitalism must have its appeal for the brave Inupiat people. They seem to want a lot of our stuff. I would too if I was beset by a polar bear and had to resort to a sharpened piece of whale bone at the tip of a wooden shaft.
Wanting a lot of our stuff was one theme in the next excursion into a mind that tilts left. Who’d the editors choose to join the lineup? It was Jared Diamond, UCLA Geography prof and author of Guns, Germs, and Steel. He presented an incoherent piece of punditry that rambled through the 9/11 hijackers, ebola, social envy, and to his main point: inequality is the single biggest threat to harmony and the march to kumbaya (pidgin English for “Lord, come be here”).
Jared Diamond
Let’s take a timeout to unwrap the “inequality” thing. Definitions first. Don’t confuse “same” with “equality”. Things don’t have to be the “same” to be “equal”, and vice versa. It depends on your metric for both. If your measuring stick is quantity of wealth, as it seems to be for Diamond, he obviously means the equality in wealth and not a demand for people to be the same in all things as they pursue it. Diamond’s obsession is with “wealth”.
But is the inequality of it always and forever bad? Is it the principle cause of all bad things today? Color me skeptical. Inequality is found everywhere in nature. Why not with us? Everything from rocks to trees and from snakes to apes are not equal. Watch a herd of hippos and the dominant alpha male protect his harem. He’s got more than the rest of the male pachyderms. I’ve got a forest of pines on my property and none of them are equal. Some have obviously hogged more light. The only way for equality to exist is our forcible intervention to cultivate uniformity in a tree farm behind fences, something reminiscent of a gulag.
So with people. Individuals, tribes, groups, and societies vary in their accumulated wealth. I suppose that the riches could be resented if it was capriciously extracted by force. But what if it was sanctioned by time-honored custom? What if it was an outcome of some person’s natural affinity for acquiring it and having the freedom to pursue the natural affinity? Ditto for societies. Some possess an ethos that comports well with rising standards of living, and the acceptance of some having more, they being the catalyst for the wealth that unavoidably spreads to many, many others.
Got it? If not, read a little from Joseph Schumpeter.
Fon Ndofoa Zofoa III of Babungo, the Northwest province of Cameroon. He inherited 72 wives and 500 children after his father’s death. (photo: CNN)
Diamond can’t seem to grasp the naturalness of inequality. And he can’t grasp the fact that when you try to impose it, as in a tree farm, you never really get rid of it. You only changed the protocols for it. Instead of a Vanderbilt getting rich from providing a cheaper and more luxurious service to the public, the Bolsheviks created the grasping party and state apparatchik – the nomenklatura in Soviet-speak. If you want to talk about arbitrary, that’s arbitrary. The whole system is only possible if the state is the sole proprietor of the guns in the place – i.e., the police, secret and otherwise, and the armed forces (no posse comitatus laws here). Those unwilling to tolerate the scheme disappear or find themselves in the “tree farm”. Inequality oozes out despite their best efforts to eradicate it.
A Soviet-era poster of the heroes of the Soviet state.
Nonetheless, Diamond charges forward into his diagnosis of our greatest sin: inequality. You see, in Diamond’s words, the 9/11 killers were born of “inequality” in his final analysis. You see, in Diamond’s words, the conduit for inequality is globalization. From the interconnectedness of globalization, we are supposed to get envy on the part of the non-white everywhere. And envy translates into resentment, and then he gets back to the terrorism thing. His whole schema is a binge of rambling incongruity.
Yes, Jared, ease of travel and communication makes it much easier to spread the hatred of America as the Great Satan and provide the opportunity for boxcutter-wielding fanatics to turn airliners into missiles. But what genuinely animated them? Was it really their anger at not possessing a house in the ‘burbs? If you listen to their words, they are bitter about Western decadence. Remember, these are the same people who throw homosexuals off of six-story buildings. They want a return to their seventh century. Diamond, go ahead, try to uncover their hidden motivations through Jungian projection. I’ll rely on their words.
ISIS fighters.
The internet and diesel and fan turbines don’t make murderous zealots. People do that quite on their own. Who knows the origins of the world’s worst bad ideas? They have popped up since man first put stylus to clay. The last century and into our own was especially plagued by them. And some of them reside in the cranium of Jared Diamond. One could be Diamond’s infatuation with levelling. He won’t come out and say it but it’s all about international and national socialism. According to him, we must flood the zone – the zone being everywhere America’s upper and pampered middle-class are horrified – with dollars. Government-engineered Robin Hood is another way of saying “socialism”. Diamond is all into it.
But we’ve been doing it since the US first emerged as the numero uno economy at the dawn of the 20th century. After WWII, we jumped in with both feet with the Marshal Plan and endless foreign aid ever since. What has it earned us? We got the moniker of Great Satan and despots in poor countries peddling socialism as the path to power, and more inequality under their thumb. Redistribution, the go-to for the myopic like Diamond, hasn’t worked. It hasn’t even worked here with our own interminable War on Poverty. Is Diamond insane, following the well-known formula for its presence: repeating the same mistake but still expecting it to succeed?
A vacant and blighted home on Detroit’s east side. (photo: Rebecca Cook/Reuters)
The error will be repeated so long as there is a constituency for it. The more, the merrier. One way to inflate the fan base is to internationalize it. Marx saw the advantage: Workers of the world unite! Diamond has no more use for the nation than Marx. He invents an “evil” – inequality – and pushes on to internationalism. People like Diamond have an instinct for it and quickly move to empower unaccountable international authorities to take what didn’t work in America – a War on Poverty – and implant it in a UN commissariat without the slightest say-so from the people who had their money appropriated. Internationalization is essentially autocratic bureaucratization. For Diamond, he doesn’t get it. He’s still wallowing in the ether of the heady days of the First International (1864), the agglomeration of 19th century socialist pinheads. He’s there with our century’s edition of the silly trope.
After four articles, the pressure had built up in me to such an extent that I had to respond. This is what goes for as “mainstream”. Nothing can be further from the truth, unless the poison of the past has suddenly become broadly chic again. In that case, we’re back to broadly popular insanity. If that is true, we’re in more trouble than I thought.
National Geographic Society and its signature publication is part of the problem, not the solution.
The word “callous” comes from the Latin “callum”, hardened skin. The idea of a nice pair of Nikes was unknown for most of human existence. A lifetime of barefoot travel means hardened skin and “callouses” on the feet. See the connection? So, can a lifetime of committed political zealotry lead to an emotionally hardened personality, one with a furtive substratum of acceptance of wrecked lives to achieve long-sought ends? “To chop down a forest splinters will fly” was famously invoked by Lenin to signal his desire to build a socialist utopia on a corduroy road of corpses. I’m wondering that somewhere deep down in the psyche of your average Left/Democrat officeholder lies a little Lenin.
Maybe the thought shouldn’t be so surprising given their affection for Lenin’s ends, just without the holocaust … or, then again, I might be too optimistic. There’s no doubt that avowed socialists are piloting the Biden campaign bus in more ways than one. Assisting them along the way are a cadre of public executives at the state and local levels. I can’t think of a better way for them to reach their socio-political nirvana and upend a detested incumbent cruising to reelection than to create the stench of failure around him by fabricating an economic depression and lawlessness in the streets. Instilling a sense of fear and dread in the public works wonders for those seeking power over the body of Donald Trump.
I’m loathed to think that people could be so cruel, but there they sit in their little local soviets. They create their own banners to hide the reality, like Cuomo’s “New York on Pause”. California’s Newsom was the first to jump at closing down 14.6% of the US economy. The others followed suit. Soon 44 million Americans were out of work. Thousands of small businesses were shuttered as “nonessential” while the big boys – supermarkets, big-box stores, etc. – were allowed to reinforce their near-monopoly because they were labeled “essential”. Economic feudalism engineered by government dictat.
The media picks up on the drumbeat. Indeed, they are the drumbeat. The incessant dark message of doom about a virus whose ill-effects were egregiously overstated and whose lethality was highly targeted on a narrow segment of the elderly was churned into an apocalypse … and an excuse for statewide and local totalitarianism.
No wonder that in a recent Axios-Ipsos Coronavirus Index poll 51% of parents were stricken with fear about sending their kids back to school in the fall. Forget about any conception of risk, about any conception that risk is chronologically uneven, that risk follows their kids the moment that they leave the house at any time. Applied consistently, helicopter parents should morph into gulag superintendents.
Soon, a sixth-grader becomes a fourth-grader after “distance learning” under the tutelage of distracted and overwhelmed adults and the ever-present allure of the nearby Xbox. Some parents are wealthy enough to keep the learning spigot flowing with hired help. Economic feudalism will be followed by education feudalism.
Then we have the same culprits in many cases – already experienced at the nullification of federal immigration law – thumbing their noses at the White House by allowing their streets and downtowns to be turned into playgrounds of violent anarchy. Remember Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan’s “We could have a summer of love!” in CHAZ? In-between the arrests of unmasked joggers in Central Park and the painting of Marxist Black Lives Matter graffiti on New York City’s avenues, Mayor Bill de Blasio slashes the police force, mutes his constitutional role as guardian of public safety, and pronounces justifications for mayhem. The scene is repeated throughout the country in any deep blue bastion.
The economic misery and violence are quietly sanctioned, or at least seems to be. These lefty poobahs don’t seem to be in much of a hurry to quell the disorder, or bring the kids back to school, or get the adults back to work. Oh, I forgot, it’s the virus and “race justice”, they say.
And, by the way, if it ain’t “race justice”, it’s “science”. They have tried to corner the market on “science”. Yes, “science” is helpful in decision making, but these politicos have choices to make. That’s why we elect people: to make choices. Recognizing relevant scientific information, though, isn’t a green light to the Disneyland of Bernie/AOC’s dreams. “Science” can give you the nature of the virus but it can’t tell you the choice to make among competing risks. Socialists like those who run the Democratic Party always think that “science” is their personal handmaiden and, funny, always ends up with them being ensconced in the catbird seat of some all-powerful commissariat. Hogwash! “Science” and despotism aren’t peas in the same pod.
In the end, if polls are any indication, the Lefties have proven successful in creating the stench of failure around Trump, even though, remarkably, they are wholly responsible for the anguish. Which brings to mind the state of education in America. What else could explain the easily-achieved bamboozlement of the American public? The Democrats discovered that enough blue state governors and mayors exist to put American society into a tailspin. Are they calloused enough to do it? Are they cunning enough? I don’t know, but I’m suspicious given the wide lane of misinformation and ignorance open to them.
People walk past a defaced monument to Confederate soldiers in Centennial Park in Nashville, Tennessee, June 15, 2020.(photo: AP)
The appalling scenes of defacement of our nation’s identity in the destruction of statues, the frenzies over the renaming of established places, and the jihad to expunge illusory “white supremacy” deserve the level of respect that one should reserve for a child’s temper tantrum.
They are founded on the juvenile desire for everything to conform to their wishes. Right now, these seasoned adolescents demand that the past be shoehorned into their closed-minded sense of social order. As such, they condemn long-dead others for not being them.
The situation gets worse when infant maturity has the endorsement of a major political party, the Democratic Party. What is the Party signing onto? They are adopting a campaign to exterminate the past and institute Pol Pot’s year-zero since olden times can’t be rejiggered to fit the fantasy. People in prior eras didn’t have the “advantage” of expensive, university-trained “wokeness”. It would never occur to our self-righteous founts of ignorance that folks in times past might have a slightly different conception of what constitutes the good society. For the street thug, it matters squat. The intolerance of the youthful-and-ignorant zealot is now part of the Party’s platform.
Like it or not, George Washington can’t be made into an advocate of the belief that a person can think themselves into a different sex. For all of Thomas Jefferson’s forays into revolution, he can’t be made into a neo-Marxist. These national paragons were a product of their time every bit as much as a Black Lives Matter/Antifa street hooligan is a product of theirs. It would never occur to the spoiled hood that people in the past were trying to form the good society too. They just had a few different ideas on how to accomplish it.
For the bulk of people in earlier times, and awkward for us to accept today, they might believe that social peace is best advanced through a separation of the races; or a childrearing that requires the woman to be chained to the home; or a peace and stability that is best achieved in a unity of the secular and religious in a person of hereditary authority; or the ancient notion that slavery is just another possible station in society; etc.
But alongside those notions, we see emerge out of Christianity the equality of all souls and our ideas of morality, justice, rule of law, popular sovereignty, due process, equal protection, etc. The woke malcontent can’t grasp the concept of a developing ethos. For these youths, if it doesn’t align with their prejudices of the here and now, it must be ground down by the wheel of history – the jargon of the 20th century’s worst blood-thirsty totalitarianisms.
On Feb. 22, 2017, Middlebury College students disrupt and assault Charles Murray and his academic co-host at the start of a forum on social issues at the college. (photo: Huffington Post)
Our modern street punks really don’t have a mature sense of what constitutes the good society to present to us other than a desire to manufacture equality everywhere and on everything, real or imagined, and overthrow something vaguely referred to as the “system” or “man”.
These simpletons can’t imagine that many wild excursions into ideological frenzy produce inhuman dead ends. In fact, more misery may result. The French Revolution had its Reign of Terror and descent into despotism. The Bolshevik Revolution from the git-go was a woke exercise in stamping absolute equality on everything, and it gave birth to a 74-year nightmare of gulags, a party and personal dictatorship, bloody purges, a huge army of secret police, show trials, the use of famine for ideological ends, and a generally sordid existence. The same experience is being replicated in today’s Venezuela. Ditto for China. Our young fanatic isn’t aware that he or she might be walking in the footsteps of history’s worst killers and harbingers of misery.
Such a thought is inconceivable to our fired-up juvenile wrapping straps around the neck of Christopher Columbus or the Virgin Mary. They are intolerant of others who can’t be them. Sounds to me like a screaming fit posing as a revolution.
Watch Dan Cathy, CEO of Chick-fil-A, engage in an act of secular humiliation.
Cathy’s heart may be in the right place, but this isn’t an act of humility in the Christian tradition. It has more in common with the mob’s contemptible and often brutal denunciations in the heady days of Mao’s Cultural Revolution. Anyone seen as better off than someone else – “privileged” in today’s groupthink – was publicly abased, often with torture and/or death. If you’re keeping a scorecard of misery, the death toll ranged from hundreds of thousands to millions, and only ended when Mao succumbed to join the rest of history’s great monsters in evil’s hall of infamy. “Transformative” revolutions, which Antifa and Black Lives Matter are pursuing, don’t end very well.
He might think that he’s fulfilling the expectations of Christ. In reality, he’s helping to sustain a totalitarian movement which will have disastrous implications for all of us – black, white, et al.
“Black Lives Matter” isn’t limited to the literal meaning of the words any more than “Bolshevik” (the majority) is. It’s the title of a political front that can be loosely organized, sometimes more disciplined, but coalescing around a set of lies and half-truths. The demands around the unprovable “systemic racism”, the calls for reparations and defund/abolish the police, and the always fungible “white privilege” are a replay of the dangerous jargon on Krisallnacht (Germany, 1938), the Petrograd Soviet/Bolshevik Central Committee (1917), Mao’s Chinese Communist Party (1949), the Khmer Rouge (Cambodia, 1975-1979), etc.
A Khmer Rouge soldier waves his pistol and orders store owners to abandon their shops in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, as communist forces take over the capital in April, 1975. (Photo: AP)
Required reading for Cathy and any of our corporate leaders should be the “Black Book of Communism” by Stéphane Courtois, Nicolas Werth, Andrzej Paczkowski and several other European academics. The “rich” – or “privileged” in today’s jargon – don’t end up in a nice place.
An act of public humiliation at the feet of a Christian rapper is not what this moment requires. It’s steadfastness. This moment necessitates Christians to denounce an anti-Christian crusade, not engage in displays of ostentatious humiliation that do nothing but give it a credence that it doesn’t deserve.
Cathy, get up off your knees and both you and Lecrae condemn a movement who’ll bring nothing but misery to the “privileged” and “unprivileged”.
The whole scene was disgusting, far from righteous. Shame on you, Dan Cathy. You have given me another reason to steer clear of Chick-fil-A.
MLB front offices take up the mantra of the neo-Marxist Black Lives Matter, July 10.
“Big Sports” in America has chosen to hitch their wagon to a radical political movement founded upon a mountain of untruths, half-truths, and out and out lies. If the NFL, NBA, MLB and MLS want to join the ranks of the perfidious, I refuse to let them drag me into the position of being an unwitting patron of the deceit. I’m cutting my ties with them. I love athletic competition, not athletic competition tied to a neo-Marxist revolution.
Indeed, since all of us are created in the image of God in the Abrahamic tradition, black lives matter, as do all lives. Black voices matter, as do all voices. Of course, some voices matter more than others if what comes out of the mouth is grounded in reason and empirical data. Sadly, that isn’t always true. Some claims carry an unwarranted ring of truth only because they are repeated so often that the unthinking person becomes even more unthinking and prone to political manipulation. Watch Thomas Sowell provide much for your typical social justice warrior to ponder before they rush off to the next statue-toppling bacchanalia.
Of particular note in this 1981 episode of Firing Line is the rank condescension coming from an established east coast liberal, one with all the respectable Ivy League and professional credentials, Harriet F. Pilpel. She joins Buckley in the questioning of Sowell. She exhibited one the most blatant examples of vile noblesse oblige since the days of rampant serfdom. Some of her queries were predicated on her assertion of the inability of poor black parents to make the “best” choice of education for their children. Without saying it, she was all-in for the overseer of the antebellum South to be replaced by the overseer of the education bureaucrat and the self-serving officers of the teachers’ unions. Frankly, it was disgusting.
And these were the architects of the War on Poverty – a “war” we are still waging … and apparently losing. A Princeton degree is not a license to supplant the parental rights of the poor. The results of these overweening social engineers is not encouraging, what with the annihilation of civic order and the nuclear family in poor neighborhoods. It’s currently playing out on our inner-city streets.
