A Political Coriolis Effect

The Coriolis Effect: the natural bending of global air and water currents due to the earth’s rotation on its axis.

The global oceanic gyres from the Coriolis effect.

I’ve often wondered why liberals since the late 19th century have a reflex to lean ever further left.  The tendency is very pronounced in today’s Democratic Party.  Propositions that were soundly rejected only a couple of years ago have morphed into near dogma in the party.  Take for instance the almost universal embrace of gargantuan social engineering in Green New Deals; or the racially charged seizure of wealth from one generation to fund awards to a current and specific racially-favored group 150 years removed from the wrong; or the open and broad avowals of faith in socialism, while, for some, still denying it; or the proud espousal of confiscatory taxation in spite of its historically ruinous effects (JFK would be shocked.).

Aleksander Solzhenitsyn presents a possible answer in the second volume of his 3-part historical novel, “The Red Wheel: November 1916”.  In describing the rise of Russian left radicalism in the decades prior to the 1917 revolutions (there ended up being two in March and October), he compares the liberal’s leftward reflex to the natural phenomena of the Coriolis effect.  Here’s how he puts it:

“Just as the Coriolis effect is constant over the whole of this earth’s surface, and the flow of rivers is deflected in such a way that it is always the right bank that is eroded and crumbles, while the floodwater goes leftward, so do all forms of democratic liberalism on earth strike always to the right and caress the left.  Their sympathies [are] always with the left, their feet are capable of shuffling only leftward, their heads bob busily as they listen to leftist arguments – but they [are] disgraced if they take a step to or listen to a word from the right.” (p.59)

Aleksander Solzhenitsyn

Makes sense to me.  Daniel Pipes in his magisterial works on the Russian Revolution described the blind spot in the outlook of the liberals as they deposed the Tsar in March of 1917 and tried to build a constitutional republic.  If there was a threat, they were convinced it would come from the right.  They ignored the warnings of the intelligence services that left extremists, the Bolsheviks, were arming and planning a seizure of power.  Low and behold, Petrograd was left mostly undefended and the rest of Russian history thereafter is one of villainy and misery.

The 1930’s Holodomor, or Stain-engineered famine to destroy peasant resistance in southern Russia and the Ukraine.
New arrivals to the expanding chain of concentration camps as part of Stalin’s war against the peasants in the 1930’s.

What lies in store for us as we approach the momentous date of November 2020?  We have a president wounded by the incessant drumbeat of an increasingly radical left Democratic Party with numerous allies in the media, academia, entertainment, and among the campus and street mobs.  His opposition, the Democratic Party, has become the vanguard of the radical left’s implementation of an all-encompassing transformation of all of society to fit their warped vision.

Antifa protesters burning American flags.

Will the political Coriolis effect in modern America duplicate the misery foisted on Russia?  This is the time for some serious adult thinking on the question … before it is too late.

RogerG

Comments

comments