We Are All Bobos Now

Bourgeois Bohemians in New York City.

Pres. Nixon in an off-camera remark to ABC News anchor Howard K. Smith in 1971 said, “We are all Keynesians now”, or something like it. Nixon was describing his about-face on the gold standard and the imposition of wage and price controls. Nixon announced that once again the government interventionism of Keynes – the high priest of Democratic Party economics going back to FDR – was back in vogue in response to the onset of stagflation (stagnant economic growth and inflation). Smith was astounded by Nixon’s reversal and compared it to a Christian declaring, “all things considered, I think Mohammad was right.” It’s interesting to see how a thing becomes so pervasive that it seeps into individuals and groups historically resistant to it.

President Richard Nixon during an Interview with John Chancellor, Eric Sevareid, Howard K. Smith and Nancy Dickerson for the Television Special Program “A Conversation with the President” (1971).

Bobos in America

The same could be said of cultural shifts. For instance, a new set of values and mores percolates from the world of the beau monde (the beautiful people, the smart set, the jet set) to the acquisitive middle class. One of the recurring worries for Republicans is the gradual shift of the suburbs to the Democrats. What would account for it? Here’s a thought, reworking Nixon’s famous quip: We are all bobo’s now.

Bobo’s? The term jumped into the vernacular when David Brooks authored Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There in 2000. The portmanteau (two words collapsed into one) of “bourgeois” and “bohemian” signified the presence of a new and growing social class starting in the 1970’s. It was a blending of meritocratic capitalism (bourgeois) and the hedonism of the counter-culture (bohemian). The socially unconventional became married to the pursuit of wealth and status.

A witticism of Andrew Breitbart’s completes the theoretical outline. He was famous for saying “politics is downstream from culture”. So, as goes a person’s values and mores, so goes a person’s politics. As goes the values and mores of suburbanites, so goes their politics.

Andrew Breitbart

The counter-culture seeped into the jet set and then into the aspiring middle class and their ‘burbs. At the upper end of the social matrix, it’s found in all sorts of cosmopolitan settings: corporate boardrooms; the corporate boardrooms of the NFL/NBA/MLB/NHL/MLS (Big Sports), including their millionaire and billionaire players and coaches; anywhere the sartorial excellence of a Desmond Merrion suit is commonly on display; unsurprisingly our faculty lounges up and down the K-grad school pyramid; big media throughout its digestive tract; and anywhere open and closed office spaces are inhabited by people with a college degree. The residential destination for this comfortable counter-culture could be a penthouse, but frequently it’s outside the urban core where there’s room for manicured space – the ‘burbs and the vast stretches under the reign of large-lot zoning.

This is not a culture of the 1950’s stiff-necks of grey flannel suits in an IBM corporate suite. These bankers, moguls, buccaneers of high finance, partners in Big Law, and entrepreneurs of Big Tech vote Democratic and shower contributions on its favorite causes. The holy grail for them is environmentalism as it was for the Gaia-worshippers hanging out in Big Sur. This goes a long way in explaining the enthusiasm for climate-change nostrums in the form of the lifestyle totalitarianism under anything labeled “green” and “sustainable”. They can afford the costly mitigations or simply bear the expense to avoid them. An army of lawyers and accountants is a text message away, as is a plane ticket to that second home in Barbados.

Bobo style

The fact that the regular middle class isn’t in a position to bear the brunt of their new-found social and political enthusiasms prevents them from going all-in for the program. The prospect of high taxes, impaired professional opportunities, deteriorating futures for their children, and counter-culture values producing counter-culture politicians who don’t esteem public safety is like a wintertime dunk in the North Sea for our groggy suburbanites.

The predicament for the Republicans is that the ‘burbs are no longer reliable. It won’t take much for them to follow the inclinations of their values and disregard their direct interests. It’s an opening for the Democrats that is made possible by Trump’s coarse tweets.

Soccer moms?

Even so, I still don’t get it. Why flirt with ruination by a Soviet-style economy and cultural Marxism because Trump won’t discipline his tongue or tweets? It sounds like amputating your foot (our way of life) for a hang nail (Trump’s boorishness).

Case In Point: Bobos in the NFL

NFL executive Peter O’Reilly was given a tour of the Super Bowl volunteer headquarters Tuesday afternoon by Elle Kehoe, director of volunteers for the Super Bowl in 2017.

The predicament for Republicans presents a predicament for fans also, many of whom are in the suburbs. Today’s locker rooms resemble less the smelly and crude places of Jim Brown’s day and more a premier suite at the Waldorf Astoria.

San Francisco 49ers locker room.
Carolina Panthers training facility.

The contracts of the crème de la crème talent rank them with the Saudi royal family, or at least the GDP of a Central American country. Even the payout for a journeyman player for the years that they are in the league is handsome enough to justify taking time off from the real world to cash in. Lebron James and Patrick Mahomes can afford to be trendy, and so they are in lifestyle and mind. Stephan Curry and his coach Steve Kerr have status and wealth to insulate themselves from the real consequences of their beliefs. They can afford to perpetuate insidious insinuations about America and its people and never really pay a price. Every woke event to go viral will provoke another half-witted turn before cameras and microphones as if they have something profound to say.

Watch this video of rich NFL players making politically-charged statements.

What’s the average fan to do as his stores are looted and burned and he is constantly shamed for being a racist while sitting with his family at his favorite restaurant? On the tube, the fan must weather the haranguing lectures of people who are athletically talented at doing one thing, dunces about any other serious topic, but now demand to be taken seriously as a modern-day Socrates.

I personally couldn’t take it anymore. I haven’t watched the NBA in the last few years, and now don’t plan to. The NFL, like the NBA, including MLB and the rest of corporate Big Sports, have turned themselves into advertising agencies for Marxist political movements. If they existed in 1917 Russia, they’d be barking Bolshevik slogans and wearing warm-ups with Lenin’s visage instead of George Floyd’s. Watching a game under these conditions is like viewing one of those massive Mayday spectacles in Pyongyang with chintzy revolutionary slogans and the huge cult-of-personality portable murals. The game is now clickbait for revolution.

Yes, part of the problem is the insulation from how the other half lives and works – more like 95% – that wealth and esteem accord. That’s not all. Another ingredient is the increasing bureaucratization of Big Sports, the thing that makes them “big”. Bureaucracies require armies of administrative white-collar managers. Knowledge, interest, and personal experience with the sport isn’t necessary. More important is experience in administrative fields made possible by a college education. At this point, we have corporate NFL as distinguished from the sweaty lives of athletes on the field. The worlds are galaxies apart, unless you are among the league’s player aristocracy.

Twitter CEO Dick Costolo and NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell chat at an NFL event in Seattle in 2014.

Roger Goodell, the current commissioner, a three-sport high school star but hobbled with injuries before he could matriculate to college, has a similar route up the greasy pole as any one of the 69 Goldman Sachs partners. Here it is: BA in economics from Washington & Jefferson College (Penn.) > intern in the New York City office of NFL commissioner Rozell in ’82 > New York Jets office intern in ’83 > assistant in the NFL’s Public Relations Dept. in ’84 > assistant to AFC president Lamar Hunt in ’87 > variety of administrative roles under commissioner Tagliabue to 2001 > NFL’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in 2001 > NFL commissioner in 2006. Goodell never strapped on shoulder pads for one minute in college or the big show. He’s a creature of a corporate swamp.

Dawn Aponte (r) and the Miami Dolphins Dennis Hickey.

Take a look at Dawn Aponte, the Chief Football Administrative Officer, NFL Football Operations: grew up on Statin Island, NY > accounting BA from University of Delaware in ’93 > New York Jets accountant, ’93-’94 > MA in finance and management from Wagner College and law degree from New York Law School by 2001 > New York Jets personnel assistant in 2001 > Jets manager of football administration in 2003 > NFL’s management council as vp of labor finance in 2006 > Cleveland Browns vp of football administration in 2009 > Miami Dolphins senior vice president of football operations in 2010 > Dolphins executive vice president of football administration in 2012 > business development executive at RSE Ventures, a sports and entertainment tech firm in 2016 > NFL’s chief administrator of football operations in 2017. Her world is east coast cosmopolitan/east coast college/white collar salary/up the greasy pole.

And so it goes for much of the NFL’s Operations squad. There are a few others with backgrounds in officiating or as players, but the majority go from college to the ladder up the corporate suite. By values and mores, the suits from lackeys to big salary have more in common, socially and culturally, with the faculty lounge, Manhattan, and Westchester County than the guy in the $120 jersey watching the game on his Costco-purchased tv and who admires Buffalo Wild Wings for its many big screen tv’s and “fine cuisine”.

No wonder we get the lefty platitudes thrown in our faces. The strategy comes from people who wouldn’t dare be caught in the company of tailgaters.

Bobos are now in charge of managing our sports enthusiasms, all other entertainments, media, 401k’s, and opinions. Singular instances of purported police misbehavior somewhere mean racism everywhere, as interpreted by a socially and politically homogeneous class who is far removed from their fan base. The green theology of the bobos means a head-of-the-line advantage to push every catastrophe into the climate change vortex. Current events are tinged by the mores, values, and related views of bobos at the commanding heights.

No wonder the ‘burbs flirt with the Democrats. The inundation of a uniform and one-sided perspective takes its toll. The bobos rule and set the tone for those on the lower rungs of the middle-class ladder. An increasingly irreligious, secular, and bohemian suburb is fertile ground for Democrat outreach.

At least, or until, the soccer moms and their significant others get what they asked for and will be forced to be wary of it. In other words, as with a drug addict, they will be shocked out of their political dalliances when their fortunes are scarred by their political choices. As a coach, I know that failure can be therapeutic.

I am not cheer-leading for failure but I see its silver lining. Too bad it’ll come at the expense of foreclosures and stunted opportunities for generations to come.

RogerG

A Celebration of Anger and Misery

Kansas City Chiefs and Houston Texans players meet on the field during a moment of “unity” before an NFL football game Thursday, Sept. 10, 2020, in Kansas City, Mo. J.J. Watts called the boos from fans “unfortunate”. Watts naively thought the word to be innocent enough. In reality, the word is politically charged and synonymous with “systemic racism”. Unbeknownst to Watts, it is laden with political sloganeering. The booing fans had a better understanding than him. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)

Jason Whitlock’s post on Outkick.com about the NFL’s season opener says it all. It can be found here.

Jason Whitlock

Here’s the opening paragraph from today’s Daily Mail on the NFL’s opening night of the 2020 season:
“Kansas City Chiefs fans booed a moment of silence aimed at promoting racial justice, the Houston Texans remained in the locker room during the Star-Spangled Banner, and the reigning Super Bowl champions lined up for a singing of ‘the black national anthem’ on Thursday night as the NFL opened its 2020 campaign under dramatically different circumstances than any other season in league history.”

I didn’t watch the game since I don’t have a taste for mixing left-wing politics with athletics. Make no mistake about it, the whole thing legitimized a left-wing agenda.

In the write-ups on the game, a ritualized justification for the politicized antics at the start of the game hovered around the words of “unity” and “solidarity”. What nonsense! Unity and solidarity for what? The lexicon is cover for the development of a group mind, the kind of group mind found in past and present ideologized tyrannies. Do places like Berlin, Moscow, Havana, and Pyongyang remind you of anything?

North Korean students perform in front of Kim’s statue at Changdok School in Pyongyang in 2012.

The words cover a pack of monstrous ideas, the kind of ideas that insult the mind. “Systemic racism” is inherently improvable but politically useful in a power grab. So were Marx’s “worker alienation”, Galton’s “genetic determinism”, Lenin’s “revolutionary theory”, National Socialist “racial inferiority”, and the like. Such words appeal to the worst in us, and not surprisingly bring out the worst in our behavior. Look at our college campuses and urban conflagrations. Disgusting!

BLM, Chicago
Looters smashing a window of a store front on School street after the Black Lives Matter rally at the Massachusetts State House. (Jesse Costa/WBUR)

The catch-words remind us of humanity’s past sins while ignoring how our political legacy paved the way for enormous betterment of all people. What will they replace it with, an energized central government with them in the catbird seat? The spectacle was appalling. It deserved to be booed, and I hope the ratings are terrible.

Goodbye NFL. You have managed to spoil a once good thing.

RogerG

Idiocy Under the Guise of Tenure

Prof. K-Sue Park of Georgetown Law

Do you wonder why the abuse, tantrums, assaults, and the hurtling of bricks at police in many of our cities seem to be increasingly performed by college-age adults, many of them middle class and white? One contributing factor could be people like Prof. K-Sue Park lecturing your kids. She’s got an impressive resumé with paper from Cornell, Cambridge, Harvard, and Berkeley. After all that matriculation, she somehow uncovered the mental yoga to make freedom of conscience a second-class right. Yep, free speech in her bizaare rendering must be made to conform to the jihad against every sort of inequality that a person can fabricate. Karl Marx was all about it, and so is Georgetown professor Park.

I ran into this jewel of the faculty lounge in my early morning readings. Here you can read the entire screed in her New York Times op-ed from 2017. This is what goes for erudite thought in our discombobulated times and halls of higher-now-lower learning.

In a nutshell, for Prof. Park of Georgetown Law, inequality of condition means inequality of speech. And by all means, everything must be equal … but nothing is, in nature or by the mind and hand of man or woman. Even our attempts to intentionally create it fail. There remained an immense gulf between Stalin and his poliburo and the rest of the inhabitants of the Soviet Union. The drive to the proletarian heaven produced an entire class of privileged government functionaries – the nomenklatura – with a character eerily synonymous with the 18th-century French aristocrats hanging around Versailles.

People like Park can’t get away from inequality even if they try. It’ll certainly empower people like her to the detriment of the proles. She’ll preside over the training of the young folks who’ll later be entitled to dispense judgments on allowable speech – of course, while keeping an eye on the personal assets of the speaker, not the facts of the case. If not in positions of power, her pupils will fill the ranks of the mobs busting into your homes and businesses yelling canned distillations of her teachings.

Police use pepper spray on protesters at the corner of Randolph and Dearborn streets in downtown Chicago on Aug. 15, 2020. (Chris Sweda / Chicago Tribune)

This isn’t law; it’s lawlessness. The law must be knowable and understandable. Park’s dangerous silliness makes it unknowable and mysterious, a perfect sanction for tyrants, as any decent study of history will show.

It’s amazing that a truly educated person can produce such bunkum. Yet, here we are with our politics roiled by claptrap, and dangerous claptrap at that. All to the tune of $175,000 per year (average salary of an Ivy League professor).

RogerG

I Am Worried for My Country

BOSTON, MA – OCTOBER 01: New York Democratic congressional candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez speaks at a rally calling on Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) to reject Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court on October 1, 2018 in Boston, Massachusetts. (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

The thought plagues me. Are the American people so unwitting that they are willing to let into power a cultural entity so inimical to human flourishing? Is this “wisdom”, as in the “wisdom of the American people”? The congery is nothing but a patronizing and trite slapstick mouthed by grasping aspirants of power and worth about as much.

Democracy, after all, is just a game of voting and counting them up. As in a game of baseball (when the coaches and players aren’t kneeling), there are runs (votes) and a total score. The outcome is a matter of math, not “wisdom”. The result only becomes “wisdom” if it validates the presence of a benign culture from which sprang the result. But as a pundit from long ago would say, this ain’t your grandmother’s culture.

Antifa demonstrators in Portland in 2019.

Something happened along the way. This is not a culture infused any longer with the beatitudes, the Genesis and Exodus stories, The Passion Play, the recognition of human failing in the presence of original sin, and the founders. Instead, the vacuum is filled with state-love and its cult of the “expert”, smothering group identities, obsessive hand-wringing over innumerable inequalities, and a rejection of personal accountability and self-reliance.

In other words, we have a mess. The mess has been foisted on us by our “betters”, all of whom are networked by a common social experience, an experience much at odds with realities for the bulk of the population. Many had middle class, suburban upbringings – the only mundane aspect of their backgrounds – and attended elite universities. Church might have had some relevance in their early years but it’s hardly detectable now. The corporate boardroom isn’t that much different from the faculty lounge in resumé and belief.

Church attendance in the broader society is way down, and we are starting to see Bibles burnt in the public square and the desecration of churches and statues of saints. The fundamental premises of these actions are increasingly found in the Democratic Party. Christianity will only have a role if it serves the Party’s post-truth doctrines. Daily, you can watch Nancy Pelosi mangle the Bible’s persistent refrain for PERSONAL involvement in the lives of the needy into a command for a near-socialistic nanny state. That way, she and the rest of us can wash our hands of them by turning them over to civil service-protected, unionized public employees. It’s shameful.

Portland protesters burn Bibles, 2020.

The rise of socialism is key to the Party’s corruption. They protest – Elizabeth Warren, “I am a capitalist” – but the charge is unavoidable. If not now, when can we call them socialists? When does their claim to be capitalists give way to the reality of their socialism? Is it a difference of opinion over the choice of the verbs “own” and “control” between “power” and “property” in the definition, as in “government power to own/control property”? At a certain point, it’s difference without a difference. They propose such an immense expansion of government controls in The Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and increased taxes (they say on the “rich”) that a deed becomes a meaningless piece of paper.

This is where we are heading if today’s Socialist Revolutionary Party, aka Democratic Party, is rewarded with victory in November. For many of you, it’s what you will vote for, knowingly and unknowingly, and what you’ll get. Your exclamations about Trump’s language and behavior can’t hide the fact of Bernie/AOC’s platform as scripture for policy-making. Some hate Trump so much that they are willing to sacrifice your children’s future. Elites won’t be affected because they will be still guaranteed legacy admissions into Harvard, not your kids.

The decline in you and your children’s fortunes is a certainty since socialism doesn’t work. A foul-mouthed executive can still function successfully, but socialism can’t, even if it is headed by Mother Teresa. Turning loose the rewards of unproductivity while increasing the penalties for productivity is not a prescription for national well-being.

The polls are troubling enough to keep me awake at night, particularly one about majorities of both parties favoring a “radical restructuring of the American economy”. I know, I know, the phrasing is so broad that it entices people to check it. Regardless, a thinking person would have to ask, who will do the restructuring? We don’t have a “structured” economy. Ours is one of spontaneous associations, also called freedom, also called a free market.

Central planning in LA. Mayor Garcetti and the city council endorsed a classic example of central planning in their drive to 100% green energy by 2045. Central planning is notorious for setting targets like those set by Gosplan in the USSR.

“Structured” economies have central planning, i.e., someone to structure them – like Gosplan in the USSR. Therein lies the rub: no small group of people can manage an economy, and it will have to be small since large groups undermine “planning”. It’s through planning that things are “structured”. The result is a Havana society of the largest open-air museum of classic 50’s automobiles and crumbling apartment buildings.

So, go ahead, hate Trump for his indelicate language and tweets and vote the socialist wolves into the American hen house. You’ll set back your children’s prospects for decades.

RogerG

Bolshevizing the Schools

Classroom in the USSR in the 1930’s.

Allan Bloom wrote “The Closing of the American Mind” in 1987. He surmised that there was something wrong in American education, and he was right back then as he would be today. In fact, it’s only getting worse.

It’s no secret that totalitarian regimes push for universal literacy in a vast expansion of the government schools and the destruction of independent ones. Universal literacy is part of the totalitarian arsenal to control minds and behavior. Once literacy has been achieved, these tyrants carefully concoct and sift what is allowed to be read. Literacy without a First Amendment becomes a horror show.

A classroom in the “The Republic of Cuba” under the control of the Popular Socialist Party (formerly the Communist Party of Cuba).

The situation isn’t limited to far off lands. That dreadful spectacle has been taking shape in our schools for decades, only to see it advance further in a misleading reaction to our current riots and shootings. Curriculums are seized for partisan revolutionary advantage.

And there will be no escape as progressives proceed in their assault on charter, private, and denominational schools. They want all children to be herded into a group mind similar to Star Trek’s Borg.

Showing their true colors, progressives applaud Castro’s successes in literacy. Once the kids have been corralled in government schools under their direction, then the spigot will be turned wide open for indoctrination. Parents, it is happening right now as our schools begin a new academic year.

Indoctrination under the guise of “anti-racism” pedagogy.

Some private schools have jumped on board. KIPP charter schools mothballed their slogan of “Work Hard, be Nice” and replaced it with full-throated campaign to dismantle the amorphous “systemic racism”. Since it can’t be proven or disproven because the thing is so ill-defined, it’s the perfect vehicle for mind control. Parents, beware of KIPP.

Other lunacies abound. The superintendent of New York’s East Harlem Scholars Academies discourages white teachers from talking about successful black Americans because to do so would be to diminish the “systemic” sufferings of all blacks. Got it?

Attributes such as “hard work”, “persistence”, “objectivity”, “decision-making”, and “politeness” are routinely degraded as acting “white”. “Systemic racism” has been expanded to encompass learning to become a good, thoughtful person.

At the forefront of this nasty campaign are Ibram X. Kendi and his screed “How to Be an Anti-Racist” and Robin DiAngelo and her “White Fragility”. The education Borg has fully embraced them and DiAngelo’s maxim: “A positive white identity is an impossible goal. White identity is inherently racist; white people do not exist outside the system of white supremacy.” What absolute nonsense … and racist besides!

This isn’t education; it’s mental child abuse. Much of the abuse is occurring in Language Arts and the Social Sciences. It’s getting to the point where parents, in order to protect their children, will have to tell them to ignore their teachers of grammar and literature and any of the Social Sciences. I’m loath to say this as a 30-year veteran of the public schools in roles as a teacher and Social Science Department chair.

Or teachers could rescue the integrity of their classes by rebelling against the brainwashing. I’m not optimistic. More likely, it’ll come down to parents refusing to let their schoolhouses churn out good little racial Bolsheviks.

Veteran or veterinarian, what’s the difference to our Che-loving hipster?

Viva la contrarrevolución!

RogerG

A Prophet of Today’s Woes

The prophet: Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881), British historian, philosopher, writer.

If you’re interested in plowing deeper into the causes of the current spate of riots, statue toppling, and angry mobs from Trump’s inaugural through the Kavanaugh hearings to the mayhem in our cities, one need look no further than a recent piece in National Review (August 29) by M. D. Aeschliman. In a nutshell, today’s urban street thugs – always half-literate despite privileged college admissions and comfortable upbringings – are unknowingly devotees of the 18th century’s Jean Jacques Rousseau, a man who dumped his children on the doorsteps of orphanages for someone else to be burdened with their upkeep. Rousseau is responsible for much of the secular dogmas and liturgies of today’s left. It’s a direct contradiction to Christianity and nearly all norms that have made human flourishing possible.

Jean Jacques Rousseau

Rousseau would make two things broadly popular: hedonism and a coercive state. On the one hand, he dispensed with the truth of human corruptibility in the doctrine of original sin and replaced it with a benign emotionalism that was, in his mind, ruined by centuries of traditions. And off our angry urchins go running to the latest gang assault on a statue, a re-imbibing of the NYT’s “The 1619 Project”, and the erasure of anything older than last hour’s Twitter storm. The shattering of norms – that old stuff again – points the way to a radical individual autonomy and a sanctioning of depravity. For Rousseau, nothing should be allowed to stand in the way of self-defined sensualism.

Nicolas Poussin, Bacchanal before a Statue of Pan, 1631 – 1633.

On the other hand, if we aren’t to be governed by anything older than last night’s leftovers and life is one continuous bacchanalia, Rousseau deposits in tradition’s stead the shadowy, spectral-like “general will”. The people according to Rousseau have a mind, or “general will”, but how do we know what it wants? Good luck … and run to the hills. Flight is the only practical option because there will always be someone to step forward with the power to decipher the national brain. Der fuhrer would make much of the all-conquering national will as embodied in him. Lenin’s will was not safely questioned. Longevity as a real or imagined opponent of Mao was an alien concept. Need I mention others who drank from Rousseau’s well? Tradition- and norm-bashing seem to lead to ugly places.

The historian Thomas Carlyle, the real prophet of today’s woes, writing in the middle of the 19th century did more than anyone to accurately plumb the depths of the French Revolution – the child of Rousseau’s mendacious thoughts – in his book of the same name. As a radical to the Tories and Tory to the radicals, he could fathom the errors of a barnacle-encrusted society while at the same time appreciate the fragility of the social order. The Jacobins destroyed the old social order and created tyranny.

Depiction of the storming of the Tuileries Palace on August 10, 1792 (artists: Jean Duplessis-Bertaux ).

Are BLM, Antifa, and the radicals now firmly ensconced in the leadership of the Democratic Party taking the place of yesteryear’s Jacobins, Bolsheviks, Red Guards, Khmer Rouge, Hugo Chavez’s Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (PSUV), and Castro’s Cuban Communist Party? Or are we to separate the Democratic Party and place it alongside Kerensky’s Socialists? And you ought to know what happened to them. For the Bolsheviks, two’s a crowd and off to the gulag and execution squads for moderates and competitor extremists.

Please read the article … and reread it. You’ll get more out of it the second time around. If you don’t want to work that hard, turn in your citizenship card because a republic requires its citizens to do the heavy lifting, or be horrifically ruled by the few who will. Lenin had a name for them: The Vanguard Elite.

The Vanguard Elite: 1920 Bolshevik Party meeting: sitting (from left) are Enukidze, Kalinin, Bukharin, Tomsky, Lashevich, Kamenev, Preobrazhensky, Serebryakov, Lenin and Rykov.

RogerG

Another Failed Experiment Waiting to Happen

Edmund Burke

Edmund Burke in the late 18th century warned of the disaster awaiting the French nation as their revolution teetered off into the Reign of Terror. Political power and political institutions are poor substitutes, he wrote, for the character forming role of traditional faith, family, and the “little platoons” of civilization reaching beyond the home in voluntary associations in the neighborhood and community. When someone’s detailed scheme bypasses the “little platoons” in order to politically engineer a better person for an imaginary better world, a calamity awaits. Past human experience proves it.

A man cleans a skull near a mass grave at the Chaung Ek torture camp run by the Khmer Rouge in this undated photo. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

The 20th century is littered with the horrors of these political experiments of grand social engineering; a lesson that today’s Democrats have forgotten or never learned. Towed by zealous and immature minds, the party lurches to the extreme left side of the political spectrum in an embrace of a fairy-tale heaven on earth with them as the grand viziers overseeing the immense project, just like the previous students of Karl Marx: Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Hugo Chavez, and Castro before them. We are on the cusp of a replay of that sordid story.

Soviet central planning is in the offing in the form of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. Higher taxes, racial reparations, and “reimagine policing” will confiscate more wealth, enforce racial group guilt leading to more wealth and property seizures, and lay the population open to the zealous and partisan mobs after law enforcement has been “reimagined”, something reminiscent of Mao’s Red Guards, the Bolshevik goons, and the Jacobin’s inflamed Paris hordes. Few will recognize the country once Sanders and the Squad have realized their dream.

We need look no further than our own past for additional proof of the consequences, a time before Bernie bros and the giddy AOC. In 1864, Maj. Gen. John Carleton wanted to finally solve the Navajo problem. In an earlier expedition, he looked upon the Bosque Redondo on the Pecos River at the edge of the Staked Plains in eastern New Mexico as an ideal place to ship the entire Navajo nation (the Diné), in spite of others who cautioned him of the poor soil and fetid water. He had in his mind the quick transformation of an entire nation into sedentary pastoralists and no one could dissuade him. So began the infamous 450-mile Long Walk of the Navajos from their ancestral lands in present-day northeastern Arizona and northwestern New Mexico to far eastern New Mexico.

Maj. Gen. James Henry Carleton

Carleton is a case study of the zealot with great political power which was conferred upon him in the midst of the Civil War. He was an energetic, strong-willed detail man who was confident in his design for the Diné and ability to make it happen. It resulted in a four-year-long reign of misery with a Navajo death toll of around 2,400. Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman put the kibosh to the whole thing in 1868 and signed a treaty which allowed the Navajos to return to a large reservation in their ancestral land.

Map of the Navajo Long Walk.
Photograph c. 1864 of Navajos after enduring the forced march to Hweeldi, or the Bosque Redondo.
Navajo group at Indian Issue House, Bosque Redondo era, Fort Sumner, New Mexico, ca. 1864–1868. Photograph by the United States Army Signal Corps, courtesy of Palace of the Governors Photo Archives.
This group of Navajos and U.S. Soldiers gathered together near Fort Sumner during the Navajo internment at Bosque Redondo in 1866.

There’s just something ominous about people with great power who claim to know what’s best for us. Today’s Democratic Party is filled with the very same arrogant half-ignorant. Unschooled in the dangers and failures of big government and utopias, they push ahead in the hope that the population will confer upon them the power to do what they promise. The promise is a devastating and hollow one.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Ralph Waldo Emerson said it best: “Be careful what you wish for because you will get it.”

RogerG

A Spring and Summer of Disrupted Lives and Riots

Destroyed sections of downtown Minneapolis after riots on May 28.

Lately, so much has been happening that scarcely a day goes by without a portentous event so serious that the normal Facebook frivolities seem senseless. ‘Tis a spring and summer of disrupted lives due to authoritarian reactions to a virus and viral videos being exploited for revolution.

The tension has been building before Trump. Riots have been roiling since the ludicrous attempt to turn Michael Brown into a hero in Ferguson, Mo., in 2014. Parts of Portland has been occupied Isis-like by Antifa for the last few years. Now, we are experiencing viral videos exploited for more revolution by one Marxist group birthed in Ferguson – BLM – and another gaining prominence after a Democrat temper tantrum for losing the 2016 election – Antifa.

Police officers using tear gas on rioters in Ferguson, Mo., August 2014.

The truth in both the George Floyd (Minneapolis) and Jacob Blake (Kenosha) cases is getting murkier by the day. The crown jewel in the uproar over police brutality is the death of George Floyd, and, as it turns out, he had enough fentanyl in his system to kill him nearly four times over. And I quote Hennepin County Medical Examiner Dr. Andrew Baker: “If he were found dead at home alone and no other apparent causes, this could be acceptable to call an OD. Deaths have been certified with levels of 3 [he had 11 ng/mL]”. One side effect of overdose is swelling of the lungs, which might explain Floyd’s cry while in the back seat of the police cruiser, “I can’t breathe”, and this before his escape from the car and the officer’s knee to the neck – something missing from the truncated, mob-inflaming version of the video.

As for Jacob Blake, he’s no Boy Scout. He had an outstanding warrant for sexual assault and this was relayed to the officers by the dispatcher according to department recordings. More importantly, why did he continue to ignore officer requests to stop and walk to the front door of his car, open it, and reach in, all while apparently holding a knife? I wouldn’t doubt the stories of prior convictions in his background.

And then we have the case of 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha this past Tuesday (Aug. 25). The circumstances of his shooting of 3 people is a huge fog bank. I suspect that more will come out both for and against the shooter.

One lesson from the ubiquitous use of smartphone video is the unreliability of them. They’re great for mob and vigilante justice. Too much is left out before the moment “play” is hit or the footage gets to the hands of a zealot. And then, beware, board up your business and flee the city.

That’s where we are at … until the fever breaks in our partisan media or a clear, unmistakable injustice is about to be inflicted that even Anderson Cooper can’t ignore.

I’m reminded of 14-year-old Bobby Fijnje who was charged with multiple counts of child sexual assault in a church child care center in 1989. He was hounded by Dade County DA Janet Reno – yeah, that Janet Reno, later to be Clinton’s AG – as a sexual fiend in a case based on “repressed memories” of children ferreted by a couple of buccaneer child therapists. The brave kid, rather than cut a deal, chose to go to trial and was finally acquitted of all charges. It broke the fever for any more jihads against phantom day care center child abuse – only to leave Reno to prove the Peter principle at Waco and guilty jurisdictions to pay millions in damages to the unjustly convicted.

Bobby Fijnje at age 14 in a picture in his parents’ home.
Janet Reno as Dade County DA.
Child therapist inventing stories of abuse by the use of very leading questions in an interrogation of a 5-year-old.
The flames consume the Branch Davidian compound in 1993 killing 74 people, 23 of them children, in an assault approved by Janet Reno, Clinton’s AG.

Will something like that rescue us from our current mania? We’ll have to wait and see. In the meantime, if you live in a city or state under Democrat control, keep your options open by preparing to jump in the car at a moment’s notice as if a category 5 hurricane is bearing down on you.

RogerG

Walking Billboards of Fear

A family wearing masks walks in downtown Los Angeles on March 22. (Apu Gomes/AFP/Getty Images)

Alexis de Tocqueville travelled to America in 1831 to initially examine our penal systems. His observations quickly expanded to include the distinctive nature of the American character in contrast to Europeans. He described an American as more rambunctious, independent, and more likely to accept risk. Using sailing ships to illustrate the point, even though the seamanship and vessels were quite similar, American ships got to Canton for a load of tea with one stop at port in a two-year voyage while European voyages consisted of multiple stops. Needless to say, Americans had a higher return-on-investment.

As he writes, “… the European navigator is cautious about venturing onto the high seas. He sets sail only when the weather is inviting.” An American “sets sail while the storm still rages” and “often ends in shipwreck, yet no one else plies the seas as rapidly as he does.” Further, highlighting self-reliance, “Americans are taught from birth that they must overcome life’s woes and impediments on their own.”

Daniel (1734-1820) and his wife Rebecca travelling westwards to Kentucky, by George Caleb Bingham, 1851 or 1852. In the 18th and 19th centuries, our ancestors flooded over the Appalachian Mtns. How many Americans today could withstand the ardors of the trek and cut a living out of the wilderness? I suspect a diminishing few..

Are we the same people as our ancestors? I wonder. Some have concluded that we have been “feminized”, meaning that we increasingly dread risk in the same manner as a mother is apoplectic about the most minimal discomfort to her baby. We might be about as far removed from our 19th century predecessors as the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) is from its gray wolf ancestor (Canis lupus), about 14,000 years, for good or for ill.

Take for instance the ready submission to the wearing of masks in regards to COVID-19. One pundit referred to the compunction for mask wearing as “walking billboards of fear”. She’s right! Many of these people are strolling advertisements of gripping phobias.

The docility doesn’t stop there. It extends to the willing acceptance without questioning of authoritarian decrees for lockdowns, six-foot social distancing, an end to common worship, etc. The meek may inherit the earth, but our inheritance will resemble an existence in a padded cell overseen by a cadre of wardens and guards.

The economist Joseph Schumpeter wrote of the indispensable role of the entrepreneur as economic adventurer. Everyone else rides in his or her wake, not everyone being so compose by temperament or ability. These economic adventurers aren’t mommies but swashbucklers of risk and innovation. We still produce them but they are easily counterbalanced by a growing army of power-hungry “experts” and a growing national population inured and dependent on the credentialed with political power.

The ground has been prepared for a new public ethos. It’s a mental state among a critical mass of the population that hovers between three semi-mystical orders: the cults of safety, the “expert”, and the state who embodies them. Combine the longing for a zero-risk utopia, a class of certified shamans with the hidden gnosis, and an authority with the power to make it happen and you have a society more at home in the World State of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World than the Federalist Papers. Safety and little tolerance for risk surpasses every other consideration and the public timidly goes along.

Helicopter parents of today – a byproduct of the cult of safety.
Kids on bikes in helmets. Today, to jump on a bike without one is considered recklessness of the highest order.
Kids on bikes in a photo from the 1950’s. How did we ever survive?

We have a population riddled with the submissive and the dependent, a dependency on the state and its credentialed overseers. The situation cultivates a population in paralysis when the promised services disappear because state and local authorities reneged on their civic responsibility in places like Kenosha, Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, New York City, Atlanta, Los Angeles, etc., etc., etc. Few citizens are willing, able, and emotionally ready to stop the annihilation of their communities. They have boxed themselves into a corner with the only recourse being the scramble to flee. Popular docility means that we go from the acceptance of authoritarian decrees to a bewilderment in the face of mobs who rampage with the quiet endorsement of the powerful.

This is not meant to be a piece against the wearing of masks. The use of masks should be, like all mitigations, conditional, conditional, conditional. It should not be a papal bull emanating out of the state capitol or DC. And if it does, there will be moments when the surviving residue of self-reliance and personal responsibility will have to rear its head to check an overweening state.

Can we recover from the stupor inculcated by the modern, progressive state? I don’t know. We are becoming a different breed of citizen. Indeed, are we more subject than citizen?

I hope, I pray that I’m wrong.

RogerG

A Modest Proposal

MILWAUKEE, WI – AUGUST 17: In this screenshot from the DNCC’s livestream of the 2020 Democratic National Convention, actress and activist Eva Longoria (L) introduces Former First Lady Michelle Obama to address the virtual convention on August 17, 2020. The convention, which was once expected to draw 50,000 people to the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, is now taking place virtually due to the coronavirus pandemic. (Photo by DNCC via Getty Images) (Photo by Handout/DNCC via Getty Images)

Have you watched any of the Democratic Convention? If, like the vast majority of America, you haven’t, I must confess to joining you in the legions of the “non-viewing”. You can’t “attend” so saying “non-attending” doesn’t apply. We are quickly learning the limits of distance [fill in the blank]. A convention without a crowd is like attempting to kiss your wife through Plexiglas. Blahhhh!

The little that I’ve seen though the lenses of CNN and Fox News was … borrrring! Everybody was “mailing” it in from remote locations, and it showed. It ain’t working.

The Republicans can learn from this debacle. Here’s my proposal for their convention in the era of COVID. Trump – like or hate him – is quite an interview and stage presence. Use him. Bookend the convention with 2 rallies in states that will allow large outdoor gatherings. The list could include Utah, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Missouri, Idaho, Alaska, and Alabama. The Republicans will bottle the crowd energy, and people who wouldn’t think of rubbing elbows with MAGA’ers get the energy of the moment. The first one opens the convention and sets the tone. The last one is the acceptance speech and thrills the warriors to rescue the land from the socialist revolutionary party (Democratic Party).

In between, scatter some Trump interviews, endorsements (short but sweet), and motion pics such as Larry Elder’s “Uncle Tom” and video pieces of urban life under one-party, decades-long Dem Party control. The idea is to keep it moving and hit the public with your campaign points like a sledge hammer. Avoid the snooze-a-thon currently on display from the donkey party.

Just some thoughts.

RogerG