California Dreamin’ or California See Ya?

Poll: 40% of Californians are thinking about leaving the state – HotAir
(Photo: AP Photo/Nick Oxford)

It’s “See ya”, or so it seems according to the outlook for the 2030 census.  Don’t expect California’s current allotment of 52 congressional seats to stay there.  It lost one after the 2020 count.  The next census will probably be more brutal (see #2).  Look at the map below.

May be an image of map and text that says '2030 Apportionment Forecast Apportionment Based on 2023 Population Estimates pepulatien farecast may have high levels variability. -1 +1 -1 4 +1 -3 -1 2 +1 +1 +1 +4 Loss f4 The American Redistricting Project Losso f3 +3 Loss f2 of2 Last 3 In 433. WI-08 Loss First 3 Out 436. FL-32 SC-08 438. NY-24 No Change 435. 435.MI-13 Gain of1 www.TheARP.org org Gain f3 Gain 4'

After the last census, the numbers were explained away by the state’s chattering classes by emphasizing that the state actually gained population.  It just didn’t grow as fast as others, they say.  Yes, but according to the website San Fransisco Gate, its population has been generally static since 2017 while our country’s South and Southeast have blossomed (see #1).

Something about population decline: it doesn’t happen in a mad dash for the exits, all at once.  The gradual slide begins with a birth dearth and flights to other areas of the state.  Whereas before, the state benefitted from foreign migration, not, mind you, an influx from other states.  That has slowed, so the total population numbers start to bend south (see #3).

Now add the numbers who’ve skedaddled.  Who’s left the state entirely?  It’s the socio-economic backbone of any state: the middle class and families.  Even the left-of-center California Public Policy Center acknowledges the shrinking middle of the demographic pyramid.  Raking in all the numbers results in a guesstimate (California Dept. of Finance) of a decline of over 57,000 in 2023 alone.  After that, they expect the numbers to rise, which is normal, but not enough to keep from losing additional seats (see #4).

Thus, by the 2030 census, hopefully, the rest of the country will be saddled with 4 fewer Adam Schiffs (now a plague on the US Senate).  One outcome of the last election is that the state of Gavin Newsom is slipping into irrelevancy.  Really, who cares how California votes, even if they’re still counting at Christmas time?  As far as the race for president goes, there are more than enough states who don’t want to be like it.  The so-called “blue wall” has given way to a red wall abutting the socialist republic.  Whew, what a relief.

May be an image of text that says 'RANIRZ TASVEGASREVIEW-JOURNALLAT REVIEW-JOURNA for THE WASHINGTONP POST LAS VEGAS 20230 YEAH.WE'RE YEAH, WE'RE HEADING to FLORIDA. FLORIDA.TAXES,the TAXES,the COST બા LIVING and CRIME are TOO HIGH HIGHHERE... HERE CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC'

RogerG

Sources:

1. “What everyone is getting wrong about California losing a congressional seat”, Amy Graff, San Fransisco Gate, 4/27/2021, at https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/2021-04-California-House-Seat-Census-Population-16133275.php
2. “2030 Apportionment Forecast – 2023”, The American Redistricting Project, 12/19/2023, at https://thearp.org/blog/apportionment/2030-asof121923/
3. “California’s population shrank in 2020, but don’t call it an exodus”, Ben Christopher, Cal Matters, 5/27/2021, at https://calmatters.org/politics/2021/05/california-population-shrink-exodus/
4. California Dept. of Finance: Report P-1A, “Total Projected and Estimated Population for California: July 1, 2020 to 2070”, at https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fdof.ca.gov%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F352%2F2023%2F07%2FP1A_State_Total.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

Comments

comments