* The following is my reaction to “Laurel Canyon” and “Helter Skelter” now showing on Amazon Prime. I recommend them but not in ways intended by the creators.
Upon preparing our transition to Montana, some very dear Montana friends advised us to replace our California vehicle plates asap. We did. It was probably the same guidance offered to any Golden State resident making a move to Oregon, Washington, Texas, Colorado, or practically anywhere. Why is the word “California” so disconcerting to our fellow Americans beyond the Sierras? No doubt, the state has a bad reputation. To be blunt, it got it after the Sixties settled in, stayed, and took over the state. Other people see the results, want no part of it, and wish to quarantine the virus.
The Sixties was a utopian cultural revolution with strong political implications that cast a dark shadow expanding up and down the coast and entrenching itself in metropolitan and academic nodes nationwide. What came to be called “the Sixties” set in motion a full-scale assault on traditions and institutions while advancing license with a heavy expansion of state interventions, taxes, and regulations to clean up the concomitant mess and make society conform to a now-discredited utopian vision. The government is by nature ill-equipped to be the cleanup brigade and only compounds the problems. California is thought by many across the nation to be the birthing center of the horror. Daily, the impression is confirmed.
The march of the Sixties went from San Francisco, Berkeley, Haight-Asbury, LA, Topanga Canyon, Laurel Canyon, Sunset Blvd., through the coastal plain, up and down Highway 1, to the halls of power in Sacramento; all resplendently displayed in “Laurel Canyon” and “Helter Skelter”. Later, bare feet and Levi’s gave way to the tweed of tenured faculty positions and the current legislative supermajorities and a lock on the governor’s mansion and every other statewide elective office in California.
Surprisingly, I came away from viewing the two episodes of “Laurel Canyon” and the six of “Helter Skelter” on Amazon Prime with these thoughts in mind. They were a reminder of the times but not necessarily a discovery. I’m a Boomer, having entered junior high in 1964. I’m aware. The films illustrate that the Sixties cultural influence lurks in the background of the great folk-rock of the Laurel Canyon scene of the Sixties and the Manson murders.
Though, don’t be fooled. The Sixties didn’t cause the Manson murders. Manson and his troupe of sycophants are responsible. Yet, the Sixties set the stage for what happened and for what California became.
The Sixties (actually from 1965 to the early Seventies), the word, came to refer to a wholesale rejection of convention. Restraint is gone, anything goes, and moral anarchy reigns. The earlier insidiousness of drug use – euphorics, psychedelics – was supplanted by a view of them as a shortcut to genius and God. Psychologist Timothy Leary at a 1966 Golden Gate Park “Human Be-In” set the tone with “Turn on, tune in, drop out”. People caught up in the whirlwind found themselves beset by addictions, sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancies, and the underbelly of the drug culture. Today, the phenomena have spread far beyond the confines of Haight-Ashbury.
The anti-convention of the Sixties ultimately became the convention of today. It’s everywhere but most intense in California, its epicenter. Just take a stroll through a Denver park to smell the spread of the zeitgeist, or travel the epicenter to experience a LA homeless encampment, the filth of the downtowns, the homelessness parked and tented along Highway 1, the growing pot dispensaries dotting the landscape, the legal and illegal pot plantations that make a hike in the California woods dangerous, and sex as recreation with an allied abortion industry to dispose of the consequences.
Belief in traditional Christianity and church attendance is taking a hit and a buttress of civility is crumbling (nationwide numbers below).
Narcissism and a short-term time horizon were other byproducts. Take away something higher and that leaves the self and an obsession with the present. The future, a fruitful legacy, and personal responsibility be damned. The Sixties-inspired absolute rule of the self overpowers everything to the point that even biological restraints are subjected to the will with enough chemicals and surgeries. Fabricated girls – formerly boys – are free to invade female spaces. The dating scene, already fraught with many uncertainties, will have a few more to contend with.
Socialism is a nice fit for the ongoing fight against convention. It, by definition, is an invasion into the conventionally protected private sphere: private property, home, family, faith, your kids’ schooling, personal economic initiative, and a person’s accumulated earnings. Free love became free-a-lot covering a gamut from healthcare, abortions, racial reparations, an expanding list of other monetary giveaways, and all of it bankrolled by one of the most onerous taxation regimes this side of North Korea. California wants to approximate a hippie commune as close as is humanly possible . . . by dictat.
Environmentalism is the state’s unofficial religion and it’s a two-fer: it’s a cover for more socialism and assists in dismantling the old conventions, their institutions and standards. Eco-fanaticism dictates your choice of car, constructs an unreliable and costly grid that sets the hillsides aflame, inflates energy prices to astronomical levels, stands by as the state’s infrastructure crumbles, and all of it managed by a state government that can’t even manage its lavish unemployment benefits (much of it illegally landed in the hands of the miscreants in the state’s prisons, see below).
And you wonder why a California license plate on a car in a Missoula WinCo parking lot is viewed with a slight undercurrent of contempt by locals? People beyond the Sierras get a daily media dose of the California malignancy. They know. Many areas of the country are only getting redder as a result. The Democratic Party is seen by many people as being under the hypnotic spell of what California has become, so much so that the House Democrat delegation almost split evenly on a resolution on Thursday (2/2/23) to condemn socialism (109 for, 100 against/present, see below). The opponents have their reasons, but they exhibit obfuscation or ignorance of socialism.
The resolution reads in part, “. . . socialist ideology necessitates a concentration of power that has time and time again collapsed into Communist regimes, totalitarian rule, and brutal dictatorships.” Some of the foes trotted out their old stand-by claim that an attack on socialism is a not-so-subtle design to eliminate Social Security and Medicare. However, all serious reforms call for a transition to a more sustainable program, one in line with our time-honored values of personal responsibility, private property, and greater returns. Demagoguing the issue hides an affection for top-down government control and the entrapment of the population into the status of serfs to the state, hallmarks of socialism.
Many voting no/present disfigured the meaning of socialism in order to cover an affection for it. Clouding their judgment is a version of socialism coming out of the Sixties love-ins in California. For them, it is a cutesy sharing of everything, whether it be belongings or bed partners. Manson demanded the surrender of all of a person’s possessions, including clothes, before acceptance into the clan. It’s a sentiment familiar to the crowd before Timothy Leary in the Human Be-In of 1966, and morphed into the Democratic Party platform of today.
The red states’ desire to contain the virus may gain strength with more refugees . . . but only to a point. Up to now, the vast majority of California refugees are the low-hanging fruit of people equally disgusted by the turn of events in their home state. They add to the red tendencies of their adopted states. Yet, when others of progressive orientations discover to their joy the availability of progressive culture in burgeoning urban settings like Nashville or Austin, without the onerous taxes, some of these red states might shift to more of a purple hue. Watch out for Colorado-ization.
And so it goes. California wasn’t confined. It took over the culture, one of our two political parties, and is shedding population like my dogs do fur. Why are they fleeing? You know, most have come to dislike California for the same reasons as you might.
More importantly, California is the sheep’s clothing covering the Sixties wolf. The Sixties was a disaster. To say otherwise is smearing lipstick on a pig, er wolf. Watch “Laurel Canyon” and “Helter Skelter” on Amazon Prime and don’t be fooled by the lipstick. If viewed with a jaundiced eye, the films show much more than what their creators intended.
RogerG
Read more here:
* “California sent coronavirus relief money to inmates living in multiple states”, Bethany Blankley, The Center Square, 1/7/2021, at https://www.thecentersquare.com/california/california-sent-coronavirus-relief-money-to-inmates-living-in-multiple-states/article_dfb87e08-5080-11eb-8fd2-5f361329774e.html#:~:text=%28The%20Center%20Square%29%20%E2%80%93%20More%20than%20%2442%20million,prison%20and%20jail%20inmates%2C%20a%20recent%20report%20found.
* More on California’s unemployment insurance scandal: “California’s Unemployment Insurance System in Crisis, Needs a Fix.”, Orange County Register, 1/18/2023, at https://www.ocregister.com/2023/01/18/unemployment-insurance-in-crisis-needs-a-fix/
* “House passes resolution denouncing socialism, vote splits Democrats”, Michael Schnell, The Hill, 2/2/23, at https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-passes-resolution-denouncing-socialism-vote-splits-democrats/ar-AA172Gvv
* “In U.S., Decline of Christianity Continues at Rapid Pace”, Pew Research Center, 10/17/2019, at https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2019/10/17/in-u-s-decline-of-christianity-continues-at-rapid-pace/