The old warning on a pack of cigarettes went like this: “SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy”. With some simplification, a warning label could be pasted on all maps: “Parents, California is dangerous to your child’s health.” How? Its eco-fanaticism will deprive them of a future, surely, if extended nationally, but California S.B. 107 promises to put the entire weight of California government in opposition to your natural right to raise your children. It’s on Governor Newsom’s desk waiting for his signature.
Go read the bill. It’s below. Under the title “Gender-affirming care”, the bill expressly prohibits medical and insurance providers in the state from releasing the identity of any child from anywhere seeking gender transition treatments even if the child’s state or local jurisdiction has laws that restricts such practices. You’ll never know as a Florida parent that your 14-year-old, in a phase of gender confusion, is taking puberty blockers, opposite-sex hormones, and sex-change surgeries in California. That’s not all. All relevant California authorities are forbidden from interceding on your behalf and retuning your child to your custody. Read it. It’s astounding.
Just think, unknown to you, your 14-year-old child may spend too much time on social media and gets caught up in a social contagion of gender confusion. Those same social media platforms will also spread information on the medical interventions, all forever life-altering, and how to get to California to satisfy the urge. Then, after filing a missing person report to your local sheriff, you get a text from your daughter of her double mastectomy and her metoidioplasty (create an artificial penis) in a California hospital. Your daughter, without your knowledge and approval, has turned herself into your pseudo-son. All thanks to the elected lunatics running California.
If any state action screams “unconstitutional”, this is it. Ever since 1824 and Gibbons v. Ogden, the Constitution gives to Congress the sole power to regulate interstate commerce. Furthermore, the contracts clause in the Constitution impairs a state’s ability to nullify agreements made in another state. n A state cannot undermine one state’s power to regulate matters within its borders simply because the resident stepped foot in another state. Kidnapping is still kidnapping if the victim is transported to a different state. Any differences between the states’ kidnapping laws are irrelevant.
Come to think of it, assisting a child in travel against the wishes of the parent could be construed as kidnapping. Gavin Newsom and Scott Wiener (D, State Senator, San Mateo) could be eligible for indictment. Remember, Panama’s dictator Manuel Noriega was indicted by a federal grand jury in Miami and arrested by US Navy SEALs under orders of President Bush 41. If it could happen to a foreign despot, why not to a sitting state governor and head honcho in the state legislature? Newsom, I’d think twice before signing this monstrosity.
The absurdity of this action by California zealots is easily understood if roles were reversed. Lets’ say, Florida passes a law to make it a felony for any person wherever they reside to knowingly authorize and protect individuals who engage in medical practices on the state’s resident minors without parental knowledge and consent. If California can expressly shield violators of another state’s laws, why can’t the offended state seek redress by taking into custody these offenders, whether they be medical practitioners or state officials, when they come into contact with lawful authorities of the offended state? Interstate interference is interstate interference. If one is sanctioned, so is the other. Goose and gander equality anyone?
It’s a useful thought experiment, and a sign of how harmful California has become to the rest of the nation. Let’s get on with it. Put the warning label on our maps.
RogerG
Sources:
* The full text of California SB 107 can be read at https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB107
* For more on the story, read the column by Sharon Supp, a senior research analyst for the Alliance Defending Freedom at https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/09/california-declares-war-on-parents-in-all-50-states-with-gender-transition-sanctuary-state-law/