Category: 2018 elections

Think of this as a personal letter to Alexandra Ocasio Cortez.  My purpose is to remind her that she’s 29, not 16, and should think like it.

Move over you establishment types, the youngins are elbowing their way in, and they fully intend to impose their fantasies on how the world works.  Many happen to be Bernie-bros/gals/? and are fully marinated in identity pandering and socialism, the bane of millennials everywhere.  The current sensation is Alexandra Ocasio Cortez (AOC), all of 29 years old and ready to lecture everyone on the need to reshape their lives to match her dream.  Her beau-ideal is a hyper version of California – take California and sprinkle a heavy dose of the looney-left-on-speed.  She wants to take this uber-cousin of California national, and international.

If you find this kind of thing appealing, sharp objects, intoxicants, and land salesmen shouldn’t be within reach.  Personally, I think she is simpleminded.  She’s proof that anyone can get a college degree and come out of it dense as granite.  Oh, she can put a sentence together but it’s all so glib.  She can’t help it since she knows and understands so little.

Her Path to an Erotic Relationship with Socialism

Her ignorance is only matched by her bravado, something common in a youthful zealot.  There’s nothing in her background to prove otherwise.  The Wikipedia bio on her reads like an inflated paper resume’.  Look for yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez

During her formative years, she was immersed in all things Hispanic.  She was coddled and favored within the cramped confines of Hispanic activism.  Not surprisingly, ethnic identity matters a lot to her and it shows in the inanities that roll out her mouth.

One of the oddities in social research is the fondness in the offspring of the comfortable middle and upper classes for lefty causes.  AOC fits the bill since she was raised in a Westchester County, NY, a region with 2-3 times the per capita income of the district that she now represents.  Things got financially dicey for the family upon the death of her father, but her general outlook had already been cemented by then.  Once it had solidified, everything else would be funneled through the mental prism.

Her education didn’t correct for the silliness, and probably made it worse.  Think of it: her Boston University BA in International Relations with a minor in Economics led her to … socialism.  Socialism isn’t economics; it’s public administration.  Socialism occurs when the government controls most of everything, ergo the public administration.  Those decisions of buying and selling are taken from individuals and turned over to government bureaus. Does she know that?  Was she ever schooled in its failures?  Real economics either didn’t stick for Alexandra  or it was the largest category of units to be cobbled together to make for a paper minor.  Either way, her socialism is ipso facto proof that she doesn’t understand the subject.

A Primer for AOC

A stroll down memory lane would help fill her huge knowledge deficits, but she’s also got an experience handicap in having been born in 1989.  Her mother gave birth as Reagan slipped off into retirement.  The last dose of domestic socialism in the mid-60’s to the late 70’s would be only a history book recitation for her, if that.  The horrors of the international variety likewise.  In the US, the period’s skyrocketing crime, the pandemics of STD’s and drugs, a near decade of inflationary recession, the Sovietizing of housing in urban renewal, the dole’s destruction of the inner-city family, etc., would be conceptual at best and therefore easy to dismiss once she settled on a weltanschauung.

Overseas, the era’s wreckage was even more stark.  Did it penetrate AOC’s brain?  If so, there’s no evidence of it.  There’s a reason for socialism’s black eye in the fall of the Berlin Wall, collapse of the Soviet Union, the Tienanmen Square massacre, the gulags and reeducation camps, the mass exterminations, and Eastern Europe throwing off its shackles and joining the West.  She might have in mind the welfare states of Scandinavia as her template for socialism, but how much does she understand their situations?  My guess is that she wouldn’t let any discomforting thoughts spoil the fairy tale.

All the evidence points to deep and abiding ignorance.  Take a look at this typical example of her airy pronouncements:

“When we talk about the word ‘socialism,’ I think what it really means is just democratic participation in our economic dignity and our economic, social, and racial dignity. It is about direct representation and people actually having power and stake over their economic and social wellness, at the end of the day.”

She’s in substantial agreement with Marx when he once said, “Democracy is the road to socialism.”  Alexandra just resurrected the old codger whether she realizes it or not.  My bet is that she’s oblivious.

She can’t comprehend that mixing “socialism” with “democracy” is just introducing more politics into the provisioning of wants and needs.  More and more of life is exposed to ambitious politicos, campaigning, political donations, busybody activists, lobbying, and civil service-protected government workers.  It’s unavoidable.  That’s AOC’s socialism, and that’s ruination.  Come on, Alexandra, do we really need more of our existence to be put to a vote?  She apparently believes so.

The resurgence under Reagan and the public intellectual debate that proceeded it appear to be beyond her familiarity.  A new cadre of free-market economists at the time convincingly showed that the long-neglected production side of the economic equation was, and still is, an important answer to the doldrums.

It’s based on a simple truism: an economy’s good fortune doesn’t ride on the job-creating potential of poor people.  You need rich people for jobs.  Rather than fleece them and cause their dollars to go underground, reduce their punishment and allow them to keep more their earnings.  Ditto for the rest of population.  It’s called “tax cuts” and they were  successfully implemented by JFK and Reagan.  The AOCs of the world want government to abscond with more of people’s earnings so a collection of short-sighted and politically powerful activists can decide.    It’s why they’re socialists, and it’s why they ought not to be trusted with power.

Others in this grand discussion of the 70’s and 80’s – before AOC was even a blastocyst – started to notice the social dissolution that arose during and after the Great Society splurge.  Government largesse in entitlements seemed to foster a dependency that isn’t conducive to human well-being.  Work requirements for welfare, broken windows policing, block granting to the states, and removing the subsidy for underage motherhood came out of this grand rethink.  Words like accountability, responsibility, and self-reliance made a comeback.  Though, not for Alexandra.  She’s clueless.

Alexandra, watch this short report from 1970 NBC News on Chicago’s Cabrini Green housing project.

She in her makeshift reasoning unknowingly wants a return to those days of Carter’s famous one-word description, malaise.

Hardly is she forward looking.  She’s stuck in the past.  Ocasio Cortez  and others like her are still planted in the mind of Bernie Sanders and his world of 1988 when he was 37 and honeymooning in the Soviet Union.  Actually, her ideological lineage  goes back further to Tom Hayden, the SDS, and Port Huron Statement.  Her’s is a reactionary perspective, not a revolutionary one.  Alexandra, here’s news for you: been there, done that.  It’s old hat.

Certain basic realities haven’t set into her brain about her favorite hobbyhorse.  Socialism, for instance, has peculiar centralizing tendencies.   You can’t have it without a central planner.  If you allow freedom and pursue only a more local variety of it, the ensuing jurisdictional competition and free choice would kill it off with great fanfare as shortages and long lines cause rapid depopulation away from the grip of local zealots like her.  The only way to implement the monstrosity is to nationally impose the misery from a central point under the sway of all-powerful ideological oligarchs.  Lenin realized it, but he was smarter and more dangerous than her.

In the end, a Socialist someone with plenipotentiary powers has to decide the answers to the basic livelihood questions: (1) What is to be produced?; (2) How is it to be produced?; and (3) Who’s to get it?  If you allow people to freely determine these matters, some will be better at it than others and get rich.  Can’t have that in Alexandra’s fantasy world.  Better we have equality and squalor than inequality and plenty in her twisted mind.

Be prepared to be inundated with her inanities through a sycophantic media now that she’s moved her shtick to DC .  Not long after arriving, she presented her latest foray into nonsense, something dubbed the Green New Deal.  Don’t think for a moment the idea is original with her.  She latched onto buzz words circulating the lefty hive.

Not that the first New Deal edition was any great success.  A compressed summary of the 1930’s  would be as follows: (1) a depression beginning in ’29-’32; (2) the New Deal of intense government intervention, following Hoover’s,  inaugurated in ’33; (3) unemployment hovered between 33% to 14% throughout the 30’s; (4) industrial production similarly languished; (5) WWII was a recess with the depression getting set to resume after; and (6) a recovery finally took hold when Congress, starting in ’47,  dismantled much of the wartime/New Deal political and economic machinery.

It’s a history that won’t comport with AOC’s  clichéd version of it.  For people like her, the War ended the Great Depression.  Rubbish.  The War was the excuse to continue a steroid-induced version of the  New Deal.  The unemployment problem was cured by putting much of the workforce in uniform to kill Germans and Japanese and herding what’s left over into factories to arm those in uniform to kill Germans and Japanese.  Industrial production went up, but factories weren’t making cars and refrigerators for the average person to enjoy.  They made the stuff that was useful in killing Germans and Japanese, with much of it destroyed on the battlefield or at the bottom of the ocean.  What kind of “end” is it when unemployment is solved by making millions of soldiers – a good number of them killed or maimed – and a rekindling of industrial production that leads to shortages and rationing, a set of circumstances not much different from the years before?

Here’s an unsettling historical fact for Alexandra: the New Deal in one of its first incarnations, the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), had a whiff of fascism about it.  It attempted to militarize the US economy as Mussolini did in Italy.  The taint isn’t surprising given the fact that Mussolini was lionized in the early 30’s for providing a hypothetical antidote to the failure of capitalism.  FDR and the National Recovery Administration’s  Hugh Johnson had kind words at the time for the tyrant.

Like Mussolini’s corporatism, the NIRA tried to concentrate all of economic life into 3 monolithic entities (government, business, labor) to set prices, wages, and production.  The thing floundered not only because of its inherent contradictions but also because it didn’t jibe with our Constitution.  The Supreme Court in 1935 put a stake through the monster’s heart when some Jewish butchers (the Schechters) challenged the National Recovery Administration’s attempt to fine and jail them for violating its ukases on chicken.  Is this what Alexandra means by a Green New Deal?  Her thoughts on the subject were likely shaped by the mental prison of people like Howard Zinn.

If the real New Deal, if she was aware of it, would be unnerving to AOC, wait till she finds out that the real recovery from the Great Depression occurred when the evil Republicans gained the majority in the 80th Congress (’47-’49) and began to dismantle a good portion of the administrative state and its nomenklatura.  Down came the War Production Board, the War Labor Board, and Office of Price Administration.  Government spending was slashed.  Maybe as many as a million civilian government workers had to get out of the business of telling others what to do and get real jobs.  After that, we had the 50’s boom.  Surely deregulation and smaller government can’t be what AOC is talking about, even though that’s what worked.

Bad Ideas Are Immortal 

Bad ideas are immune to death, mainly because a new generation of the gullible hears them for the first time and mistakes them once again for divine wisdom.  Absent are the reservations and the caution of maturing experience and a lifetime of study.  If you expect additional years in our bankrupt public schools to correct for the deficiency – K through grad school –  you’re a fool.  There, the mental bankruptcy will be reinforced, not cured.

Old lefty nostrums are recirculated and repackaged to the birdbrained innocent.  Every generation when young will be rich in the species.  For many in today’s youth cohort, the latest craze  in junk thought is the “Green New Deal”.  Nothing really new here that in many ways hadn’t already been touted by Eugene Debs, Gus Hall, Earl Browder, and the aforementioned SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) of 60’s radical-Left fame.  Most fundamentally, it’s a return of central planning.

Since central planning is key to the scheme, the Left’s latest rendition of the New Deal moniker isn’t much different from anything that hadn’t already come out of Gosplan, the Soviet Union’s economic planning agency, or Stalin’s notorious Five-Year Plans.  Only this one is in the service of international greenie fanatics, not the maniacs fighting some vague oppression of the international proletariat.

Step back, there’s elements of the latter in the former.  The similarities of Five-Year Plans and the Green New Deal make them near identical twins of the mind.  They are encrusted with lofty goals and then hemorrhage the spending and coercive means to achieve them.

But even prior to that, the plots hinge on a rigid conception of the world.  G.K. Chesterton called it “the clean well-lit prison of a single idea”.  It’s the notion that people need to be directed according to the likes of activists caught up in their own mental prison.  Their cognitive jail is the relentless pursuit of oppressors, many invented to justify the means to the desired end.  The would-be bogeymen are, for both Marxists and eco-zealots alike, capitalists or anyone who pursues a livelihood in ways the militants deem “selfish” or “greedy”.  Welcome to the mental detention center lying between the ears of Alexandra Ocasio Cortez and others with the same hangup.

Those who disagree are more than opponents.  They are “enemies of the people” to be vanquished.  This wafts with the odor of totalitarianism.  Their intense gaze isn’t just directed at what you do, but also in what you think and say.  In the jurisdictional hothouses where this mental smog reigns – California, New York, and Massachussets, are you listening? – the odor has gotten stronger as powerful mandarins seek to outlaw the speech of anyone who dares to disagree with the high priests of Climate Change.

They won’t be satisfied with the chump change of subsidies and test projects for their utopia.  They’re into lifestyle management.  You must live, think, and speak like them.  Already, the schools, with their lefty curriculum and lefty teacher training, and comrades in  big city media have become the boot camps for generating the latest version of Stalin’s Young Pioneers.  AOC would have fit in quite nicely.

It’s so reminiscent of Stalin’s collectivization of farming, extensive network of eyes and secret police covering homes and workplaces, and internal passports, leaving aside the gulags where malcontents – real or imagined – were penned.  No wonder this is nothing but a prescription for producing refugees.

So, what’s in this latest edition of the 5-Year Plan … er, New Deal?  Some sense of it can be found in AOC’s draft request for a “Select Committee For A Green New Deal”. (5)  Here’s a taste:

• A deadline of March 2020 for the House select committee to finish its Plan for a Green New Deal.
• As in Stalin’s 5-Year Plan, you’ll find timelines/deadlines to achieve certain numerical goals.  For example, in 10 years after passage, 100% of electrical generation will be commanded from the greenie favorites:  wind, solar, biomass, etc.  100%!
• A massive public works boondoggle to build the infrastructure to replace our current networks with one accommodating to the utopia.  One hasty calculation by someone in the know sets the cost at $2 trillion.  And I’m not taking into account the fact that much of the technology – such as storage – doesn’t even exist, and may not ever exist to any practical extent.
• Mandates to meet the goals will fall upon businesses, farms, and homeowners.  There will be a colossal reordering of life to achieve the targets.
• The socialist dream of wealth equality will be pursued through the Plan.  Lefty boilerplate like “just transition” [to the utopia] is scattered throughout.

What’s the upshot?  What does all this really mean for all Americans?  David Roberts in a sympathetic piece for Vox stated it quite clearly,

“… the GND is not just a climate change policy. It is a vision for a new kind of economy, built around a new set of social and economic relationships. It is not merely a way to reduce emissions, but also to ameliorate the other symptoms and dysfunctions of a late capitalist economy: growing inequality and concentration of power at the top.” (2)

The Green New Deal is a plot against the fundamental principles of our constitutional order and civilization.  It’s in the same vein as the grand pronouncements of the Marxist scolds of the past.  GND boosters are out to manufacture a new person for a new society.  What will happen to those who resist?  Well, coercion is absolutely essential or it won’t work – or, more accurately, it won’t work as the history of communism attests, but the utopian bullies won’t even get the chance if they don’t do some silencing.  Monkey wrenches will not be allowed on the path to their heaven/hell on earth.

The Teenager in Central Planning

Alexandra’s belief system is a product of profound immaturity of thought.  Her thinking is grounded only in Lefty boilerplate.  In many ways, she acts with all the excitement of a teenager who was introduced to some factoid for the first time but lacks the seasoned judgment to process it.  In a recent twitter storm with Republican Steve Scalise, the 29-year-old Alexandra tried to correct the 53-year-old Scalise by repeatedly instructing him on the meaning of “marginal tax rates”.   I think that everyone in the capitol knows term, but Alexandra acts as if she only became aware of the concept in the past few days.

She can find no fault in a marginal tax rate of 70% for the “wealthy” since she’s blind to the 60-year public debate on the matter.  Apparently, her economics education didn’t inform her of the dispute between Keynesian dogmatics and the free-market ideas of the Vienna School of Economics.  Hayek and Milton and Rose Friedman weren’t on her reading list.

As such, she’s probably not aware that she’s gearing up to imitate Joseph Stalin.  Because there’s not much rolling around in that head, the problems of our times seem so simple.  They always do for the young when there’s nothing else in the cranium to cause pause.  She’s the equivalent of a teenage central planner but is completely ignorant of the fact.

Alexandra Ocasio Cortez is proof that there is a place for people like her.  It just shouldn’t be in a room with adults.  She might be a great ASB president, but her flights of fancy disqualify her from babysitting.

RogerG

Bibliography and references:

1. “Bernie Sanders traveled to communist Cuba and urges a ‘political revolution.’ Will exile Miami take him seriously?”, Patricia Mazzei, Miami Herald, 2/29/2016,  https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/election/article62748002.html
2. “The Green New Deal, explained”, David Roberts, Vox, 1/7/2019,  https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/21/18144138/green-new-deal-alexandria-ocasio-cortez”
3. The Great Depression Was Ended by the End of World War II, Not the Start of It”, Peter Ferrara, Forbes, 11/30/2013,   https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/11/30/the-great-depression-was-ended-by-the-end-of-world-war-ii-not-the-start-of-it/#2f706afb57d3
4. “Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt”, David Boaz, Reason, October 2007,   https://www.cato.org/commentary/hitler-mussolini-roosevelt
5.  Alexandra Ocasio Cortez’s draft proposal for a select committee on a Green New Deal, and the rationale, can be found here:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jxUzp9SZ6-VB-4wSm8sselVMsqWZrSrYpYC9slHKLzo/preview#heading=h.z7x8pz4dydey
6. “Five things to know about Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘Green New Deal'”, Timothy Cama, The Hill, 11/24/2018,