Posted on

Ban-o-mania

A current  incarnation of the urban sophisticate is the “hipster”. If I may be excused for engaging in a loose generalization, like other versions of the breed, they are equal parts confident, media-savvy, and clueless.  Prime examples of the cross-fertilization of fashion and politics, they are susceptible to pleas to prohibit almost anything presented as irritating and outside of their lifestyle experience.  They are one for the constituencies for ban-o-mania.

Don’t like something?  Ban it!  Why ban it?  Simple: it’s too jarring to the mind of your average urban and self-anointed sophisticate.   That mind is riddled with the prejudices, half-baked ideas, and unexamined assumptions of a person limited to the secular equivalent of a mountaintop monastery … without the serious study of real monks (“echo chamber” keeps popping into my mind).  Ban-o-mania reigns supreme as the preferred option for anyone within the materialist abbey, while adversely affecting everyone  not so mentally and geographically insulated.

The locations for the secular monasteries generally matches the 2016 election map.  Below is a precinct-by-precinct rendering of the 2016 election results. (1)

2016 election results by precinct. Blue is for the Democratic candidate, red for the Republican.

The blue dots on the map are outposts serving as the intersection of radical chic in culture (some might call it “lifestyle”) and politics.  The journalist and essayist Tom Wolfe had a great time back in 1970 with an exposé of cosmopolitan affections for radical left politics of the time. (2)

New York Magazine cover, 1970, with Wolfe’s “Radical Chic” essay.
Leonard Bernstein (seated at center), his wife Felicia Montealegre (left) and Don Cox (standing), Field Marshal of the Black Panther Party in the Bernsteins’ 13 room penthouse on Park Avenue in Manhattan, January 14, 1970

I won’t speak to the map’s much rarer blue blobs – I suspect these to be mostly concentrations of post-1965 Immigration Act ethnic and racial minorities and Indian reservations- but today’s metropolitan islands have persisted in the habit exemplified in Leonard Bernstein’s fête to the Black Panther Party.

Though, a vocabulary update to “radical chic” is in order.  Yesterday’s “radical chic” is today’s “cosmocialist”, a marriage of “cosmopolitan” and “left-liberal”, typically among our tech elites but also littered throughout most of our corporate and academic boardrooms (hosannas to Reihan Salam for bringing the term to my attention [3]).  The “left-liberal” side of the equation is an infatuation with imperial environmentalism, high taxes, and almost anything “anti-poverty”.  “Cosmopolitan” is a reference to suspicion about regulation (except, of course, of the enviro variety, a huge contradiction), big labor (even though the teachers’ unions are 100% socially and 80% politically aligned) , and a fondness for open borders and multicultural everything.

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg (left) with California AG Kamala Harris in 2015. (Reuters photo: Robert Galbraith)

Oh, let’s not forget their contempt for traditional institutions.  The Bible as the Word of God, Christianity as understood for millennia, marriage, and morality don’t stand a chance in these micro-universes.  Currently, transgenderism has pride of place.  As a matter of fact, they have conjured “equality” into behavioral license.  Any coupling and self-concept among and within humans must be granted sanction by the state.  Those who disagree face ostracization, loss of livelihood, and censorship.  Is confinement next?  Has it already started?

Now we are well on our way to ban-o-mania – the frenzy to prohibit counter-thought, and counter-things.  If only Orwell was here to see it.

It’s become next to impossible to talk about these kinds of things without mentioning California, ground zero for cosmocialist social and political tinkering.  Bans on things previously considered innocuous are becoming increasingly common in this political zoo.  Examples are many.  The state couldn’t refrain from an assault on, of all things … free plastic shopping bags.  The usual suspects crafted Prop 67 – the always fashionable environmental lobby – and the always fashionable electorate, dominated by its always fashionable coast, approved it in 2016.

Grocery shopping in the not-so-golden state instantly changed from this:

to this:

Bring your own bags: filthy, torn, too small,  not enough, or spill out cash to buy some more.  People in the zoo will adapt, no doubt.  But grocery shopping instantly became a bit more of an annoying experience.

Another example, this time from the elected “geniuses” in the state’s madhouse, called a “legislature”: marketed as an animal welfare measure, the inmates passed AB 485.  It would ban the sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits if they didn’t come from shelters.  In essence, due to the way the law is written and it’s probably effects, say “bye, bye” to the ritual of taking the daughter down to the pet store to buy a puppy.  For Patrick O’Donnel (D-Long Beach), the bill’s author, pet militants like him can’t envision themselves doing it, so ban anyone else from doing it.  Such is the auto-reflex of the ban-o-maniac.  The legislation’s fate is in the lap of Gov. Jerry Brown, another cosmocialist. (4)

Assemblyman Patrick O’Donnell, D-Long Beach, and rescue dogs.

For the cosmocialist, dogs are cute; Christian fundamentalists are not.  The progressive fatwa against them has already begun.  With dim-witted sleight of hand, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher (D-San Diego) sought to impose her social opinions on the entire faith community in California.  Through legislation, she tried to nullify the Supreme Court’s Hosanna-Tabor decision that buttressed a church’s religious freedom exemptions to government’s contraceptive and abortion mandates. (5)  She preposterously claimed that the Court didn’t say what it said.  For the Court, religious freedom reaches out to longstanding church functions beyond the sanctuary.  She didn’t get the message.  Fletcher’s logic is the equivalent of a child’s attempt to make a parent’s admonishment of “no” into “yes”.

Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher (D-San Diego)

If mangling the Court didn’t convince, she tried the gender equality angle.  For her, the moral code in the Torah, Quran, and the Old and New Testaments must be sacrificed because a woman can show the results of a sleepover with her boyfriend.  Since women get pregnant, and men can’t (there’s no place to put the fetus), scripture must now go into the garbage disposal.  The minister can preach God’s law from the pulpit – I think – but, according to her, he shouldn’t be able to do anything about single moms and womanizers staffing his school (Was she trying to improve the job prospects for Bill Clinton?).  And this passes for serious thought in the California legislature?

A reprieve for Baptists was granted by Gov. Brown’s veto of Fletcher’s abortion to logic.  Don’t think for a moment that she and her compatriots have given up.

The Old Testament, evangelicals, pet stores, and traditional institutions are verboten to the tin-eared metro-chic.  Similarly verboten is a healthy skepticism about wild-eyed climate-change apocalyptics.  They won’t shrink from criminalizing, or subjecting to civil forfeiture, anyone who happens to make the mistake of conjoining a position of authority with cynicism about enviro end-times.  Metroplex electorates appear to have affection for Maduro-type (of Venezuela fame) DA’s and AG’s to accomplish the desired end.

Former California Attorney General Kamala Harris in September 2015.

Not wishing to leave California out of the scrum, former AG Kamala Harris (now Senator) joined the AG’s of New York, Eric Schneiderman, and Virgin Islands, Claude Walker, and Massachusetts, Maura Healey, to form an Inquisition to ferret out “counter-revolutionaries” to Al Gore’s fashionable doctrine.  It’s the latest craze sweeping the blue-dot jurisdictions: spend millions of dollars to haul into court the petroleum industry for questioning the supreme leader.  (6)  Ban-o-mania encompasses the campaign to silence opinions.

For everyone else without a corporate lawyer, loss of tenure, livelihood, or excommunication awaits.  It’s a reincarnation of Mao’s Cultural Revolution.  They’re making Mao proud … if the old bloody tyrant was alive today.

Public humiliation by Red Guards during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976).
Cultural Revolution poster. Smashing the old to make way for the new.

The same is true for guns.  Guns are as gauche to the chic denizens of metropolis as the climate views of anyone not in tune with the fashionable orthodoxy.  Not surprisingly, respect for the 2nd Amendment fades as fewer and fewer people among the self-described “betters” in urban America have knowledge and experience with the things.  This is their mental picture of gun owners, a product of too much late-night tv viewing (late-night comedians, SNL).

Yes, it’s a plain old prejudice, but it matches their ignorance.  They live a life without firearms and so conclude nobody needs them.  It’s easy for urban electorates to grant the state’s vast prosecutorial powers to AG’s giddy with the prospect of hanging a few gun manufacturers.  The aforementioned Maura Healey of Massachusetts set her sights on Glock.

Massachusetts AG Maura Healey with Eric Schneiderman, NY AG, 2016.

Whatever their rationale, come on, it boils down to, “We don’t own them; therefore, you can’t either”.  Really, lifestyle is their governing north star.

The corporate boardroom is as populated with hyper-sensitive ban-o-maniacs as deep blue state attorney general offices.  The tekkie industry is particularly infected with them.  “Caution” is the watchword for any true free-thinker in these occupational habitats.  Just as Brendan Eich, co-founder of Mozilla, learned in 2014.  He was run out of his own company when it came to light that he contributed $1,000 to the California Prop 8 campaign to defend traditional marriage in 2008.  The lefty hive in Mozilla and Silicon Valley swarmed at the knowledge.

Brendan Eich

Ideological cleansing targets anyone outside the metro groupthink.  In Eich’s case, he cavorted with those who think that marriage is by nature heterosexual, and can only be homosexual if sodomy is accepted as the act of consummation.  Of course, consummation could be dispensed with, but then marriage is reduced to a state-sanctioned friendship pact with the option of wide open conjugal behavior.  The whole concept of “gay marriage” enters the grammatical territory of “non-sequitur”.  Such thinking, though, is assigned to the Klan in the blinkered imaginations of cosmocialists.

The lefty piranha weren’t satisfied with the corpse of Brendan Eich.  They will always need to feed on anyone with the temerity to express a different point of view.  James Damore fell into the infected waters at Google when he sought to explain the small presence of women in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) industries in words different from the politically correct orthodoxy. (8)

James Damore and Google

He presented the proposition that women are underrepresented due to the fact that fewer girls have inclinations for STEM, not because of some overhanging pall of misogyny. (9)   The snowflakes erupted and the impromptu inquisitors at Google went on a rampage.  Damore found himself out of a job, fired by Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

Steve Jobs juxtaposed to Google’s Sundar Pichai amid the Damore firing, by LA street artist Sabo.

The “diversity” police went into action mode to defend the sanctity of the party doctrine.  Every one of the tech biggies has a Ministry of Diversity Truth.  They sprang in defense of Google.  At Google, its commissar is Danielle Brown.  Intel has commissar Barbara Whye.  Maxine Williams is installed at Facebook’s commissariat.  Helping the biggies is a nomenklatura of consultants.   Paradigm’s Joelle Emerson is an example.  All of them are the keepers of the diversity holy grail.

Paradigm Consultancy’s Joelle Emerson

The whole diversity shtick is profoundly open to question.  Yet, it is accepted as the closest thing to a self-evident truth among a class of people who have long ago rejected such truth when Thomas Jefferson in 1776 tried using the concept.  Their’s is a pseudo-science meant to perform an ideological function: widely propagate the dogma while simultaneously swamping disagreement.  They are the practitioners of the ban-o-mania of thought.

The tennis aficionado John McEnroe recently stepped in it when he declared what is obviously true.  Men and women aren’t physical equals on the tennis court.  For that, this time it was the equality police that leapt into action.

John McEnroe appearing before the press about controversial remarks.

McEnroe offhandedly stated in response to a question that Serena Williams would be ranked 700 among professional men’s tennis players. (10)  Boy did that get the ant hill all abuzz.  But for the equality commissariat, there was the disconcerting face-off in 1998 with a 203rd ranked men’s player, Karsten Braasch of Germany.  The Williams sisters were teenagerly brash and over-confident, bragging in the ATP men’s office that they could whip any tour player ranked in the top 200.

Karsten Braasch (center) and the Williams sisters at the 1998 Australian Open.

Braasch, ranked 203 at the time, overheard the remark and took up the challenge in a lark.  After playing a round of morning golf, Braasch arrived to play each sister one set.  The event attracted quite a crowd.  During changeovers, he smoked a cigarette and drank a beer.  He bested Serena 6-1 and Venus 6-2.  The Williams’ points had all the appearance of gifts. (11)

Was McEnroe all that wrong?

There is a sense of unreality in the blue-dot world.  The here-and-now must be made to conform to ideological fantasies.  In movies, women punch out burly men with skeletal and muscle structures that would collapse on contact if it didn’t occur before cameras and with the assistance of computer assisted graphics.  We might be able to accept these illusions since, after all, it’s the movies.  But the fantasies don’t dissipate after leaving the theater.  There’s legions of prosecutors, politicians, consultants, and academics devoted to making the movie unreality a real life reality.

To make it happen, massive mind control and social engineering are required.  All the tools of ban-o-mania are enlisted in the effort.  Ostracize, prosecute, legislate, fire, and propagandize (the Bolsheviks called it “reeducation”) anyone not in conformance with the cosmocialist zeitgeist.  The sad part is their push to take the campaign national.  Their appetites won’t be satiated with dominance over metropolis.

Watch out red America.  You’re one election away from being forced into living and thinking like a Greenwich Village hipster.  You may not know it, but you have a metaphorical bulls-eye planted on your forehead.

RogerG

Bibliography and sources:

  1. The 2016 precinct map was garnered from “Creating a National Precinct Map”, 4/30/2017,  https://decisiondeskhq.com/data-dives/creating-a-national-precinct-map/
  2. “Radical Chic: That Party at Lenny’s”, Tom Wolfe, New York Magazine, June 8, 1970, http://nymag.com/news/features/46170/
  3. Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review, contributing editor of National Affairs, advisor to the Energy Innovation Reform Project and Niskanen Institute.  “Cosmocialist” first came to my attention in his article, “Democrats and Plutocrats”, http://www.nationalreview.com/article/451463/democrats-silicon-valley-rich-entrepreneurs-changing-partys-working-class-image
  4. “California pet stores may be required to only sell rescue animals if this bill passes”, Courtney Tompkins, The Los Angeles Daily News, 9/15/2017,   http://www.dailynews.com/2017/09/15/california-pet-stores-may-be-required-to-only-sell-rescue-animals-if-this-bill-passes/
  5. “Anti-discrimination measure or blow to religious freedom? California bill sparks debate on employer codes of conduct”, Melanie Mason, Los Angeles Times, 3/29/2017,   http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-an-anti-discrimination-measure-or-blow-1490826757-htmlstory.html
  6. “Left-Wing AGs Are Playing Politics with the Law”, Jim Copeland and Rafael A. Mangual, National Review Online, 9/29/2016,  http://www.nationalreview.com/article/440542/state-attorneys-general-political-abuses-power
  7. “Mozilla CEO resignation raises free-speech issues”, USA Today, 4/4/2014,  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/04/mozilla-ceo-resignation-free-speech/7328759/
  8. “Google Episode Sends a Message: Diversity Is a Tough Sell in Silicon Valley”, Georgia Wells and Yoree Koh, WSJ, 8/10/17, https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-episode-sends-a-message-diversity-is-a-tough-sell-in-silicon-valley-1502383625; also at http://www.4-traders.com/INTEL-CORPORATION-4829/news/Google-Episode-Sends-a-Message-Diversity-Is-a-Tough-Sell-in-Silicon-Valley-24924773/.
  9. The complete text of James Damore’s offending email can be found here:  “Here’s the Full 10-Page Anti-Diversity Screed Circulating Internally at Google [Updated]”, Kate Conger, Gizmodo, 8/5/2017,  http://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp
  10. “John McEnroe: Serena Williams world’s best female tennis player but would rank ‘like 700’ among men”, Scott Allen, The Chicago Tribune, 6/25/2017,   http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/ct-john-mcenroe-serena-williams-tennis-20170625-story.html
  11. The episode is recounted here: “Serena Williams once challenged men’s player at Australian Open”, Sandra Harwitt, USA Today, 1/21/2017, https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/aus/2017/01/21/serena-williams-nicole-gibbs-australian-open/96876832/
Posted on

The Bluster of “We Need to Make Sure This Never Happens Again.”

A chant applied to the Las Vegas massacre, almost anything bad involving guns, almost anything bad involving kids, and almost anything that’ll agitate the news cycle for more than a day.

The mass shooting in Las Vegas around 10 pm, Sunday, 10/1/2017.

Lately, we’ve developed a nervous tic nearly every time an incident of mayhem invades our tranquility.  It won’t be long before a grandstanding politico trots out in front of a mike and cameras to announce, “We have to make sure this doesn’t happen again.”  The fact is, it will.  So what is up with the nonsense declaration?  It’s the intro to the politicization of tragedy.

It begins with the unquestioning belief in the magical healing powers of legislation.  Someone demands that we “do something”, and “do something” means “write a law”.  Encapsulate the cure in a 20,000-word statute.  What’s up with that?

Has anyone ever taken a look at the “geniuses” who’ll craft the cure?  Sorry, high-wattage thinkers don’t heavily populate the upper rungs of those who play the game of politics (i.e. acquiring power, or getting elected), especially on the lefty side of the political spectrum.  They may know the art of gaining power, but once in power we quickly learn that they really don’t know or understand much.  They’re fumbling, and sometimes dangerous, empty suits.

Nancy Pelosi, (D) San Francisco, Democrat majority leader.

They normally trot out their ready-made, off-the-shelf nostrums.  They don’t even have to be relevant to the issue at hand.  Just plug ’em in anyway.  In a recent CNN townhall after the Las Vegas shooting, Nancy Pelosi (D, San Francisco) quickly pivoted to her current favorite: background checks.  The question directed to her was about actions to prevent the Las Vegas shooting.  Her answer was nonsense.  Do we have background checks?  Yes.  Would of any of their proposed changes to them make any difference?  No.

Simply put, she didn’t answer the question.  Besides, her response wasn’t pertinent.  The killer, Stephen Paddock, passed background checks as he went about building his arsenal.  It’s not that he didn’t go through any.  The guy simply flew way under everyone’s radar, including his family’s.

On those “background checks”, all relevant records to a gun purchase are digitized with instant access for any government agent sitting time zones away from the site of the purchase.  It doesn’t take long to do a check.  States don’t vary that much in doing the look-see, only in the amount of arbitrary inconvenience for the buyer with their waiting periods.  Nothing much is accomplished with waiting periods; much is accomplished in irritation.

Still, even with the Democrats’ background enhancements, Paddock would fly under those too.

And with Pelosi and her gang’s proposals, she’d effectively put “dead” to due process in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments for gun buyers.  The Constitution is quite inconvenient for those in a hurry to win the political brass ring.

So, what’s she up to?  She’s up to politics, gaining the majority in Congress, and impatient in imposing blue America’s values on the rest of the country.

I could bore you to tears with examples of politicos and their love affair with silliness.  Here’s congresswomen Carolyn McCarthy, (D) New York, back in 2013 unable to describe a gun item (barrel shroud) mentioned in a bill that she supported.

You think that she’s the only one?  Here’s 2 New York state politicos intent on their own bans.

Incendiary bullets are “heat-seeking”?

The confusion among the left about semi-automatic and automatic guns is rampant.  The mixup extends to the progressive punditry.  CNN’s Don Lemmon steps into it.

The ignorance is pervasive.  The bulk of these people don’t own guns, haven’t really lived among them, and have SNL skits running around in their heads about rednecks and working stiffs.  Their’s is the world of gentrified neighborhoods, bistros, smartphone-saturation, and the college bubble.  Yet, they want to legislate for the rest of us.  When they get their hands on the levers of power, the result is absurdity.

From where do we get get this tic to legislate our way to nirvana?  It’s built into the progressive worldview.  Progressives are intoxicated with the idea of using state power to manufacture a new world, and new human beings to go in it.  That means legislation, laws, rules, decrees, and other such commands.  Out goes anything not familiar to them in their cloistered existence.

Maybe something can be done about “bump stocks”, but don’t expect it to change the dynamic of fevered imaginations intent on killing large numbers of people.  If the desire is there, a means will be found.  In other words, it will happen again.

Evil resides in the souls of some men and women … but, first, you have to recognize the existence of evil.  Now that’s something to scoff for your average run-of-the-mill urban sophisticate.

RogerG

Posted on

A Cause Without A Cause: The NFL Player Protests, Black Lives Matter, the “Blue” Cocoon, Trump’s SOB’s, and the 1947 Movie “Boomerang!”

Most Oakland Raiders sit during the national anthem on Sunday Night Football, 9/24/17.

The NFL player protests, Black Lives Matter, the “blue” cocoon, Trump’s SOB’s, and the 1947 movie “Boomerang!” came to mind during the sit-ins by half-million-dollar-per-year protesters Sunday,  September 24.

The first three on the list are animated by a faulty postulate: American law enforcement is riddled with racism.  It’s the “cause without a cause”.  In this case, “cause” being a premise without some relation to facts .

The slander has its biggest and loudest following in urban and academic centers, the so-called “blue” precincts.  It has spread beyond the street and campus into professional sports – who, by the way, are centered in “blue” America – and earning the ire of a huge part of the fan base in “red” America and President Trump.

As for the movie, “Boomerang!”, it reminded us that “justice” is the ultimate goal of all legal proceedings, and hopefully resistant to mobs inflamed by falsehoods (more about the movie later).  Real justice is an inconvenience for those in a hurry to hang a few cops.  Now, professional athletes are getting sucked into the sordid enterprise.

So, in the end, we have the NFL tarnishing its reputation, players heightening their profiles as political firebrands, fans registering disgust, and all because of a demonstrably false proposition.  Don’t expect justice here … but reckon a humbling decline in the once-vaunted NFL.

It’s a lesson for all high profile sports: Don’t insult your fans!

A good chunk of sports fans might have a very different take on issues like policing the streets of many of our wannabe Kabuls and Baghdads.  Your average fan sitting in font of his big screen TV on Sunday afternoon probably doesn’t see the world like your typical Sociology professor or average campus SJW (social justice warrior), and for good reason.  The alleged racism in police departments, so readily accepted in faculty lounges and by impressionable  college sophomores, isn’t supported by the facts.

First, crime, like wildfires, isn’t evenly distributed.  Local circumstances produce divergent results, without ever getting into the racism of the “man”.  Certain areas of the country have a fecundity for crime as areas of thick forests produce a fire season.  An infamous example is LA’s “death valley”, South Vermont Ave.  Read the captions. (1)

Since 2007, 61 people have been killed on a two-mile stretch on or near South Vermont Avenue between Manchester Avenue and Imperial Highway. The area is the border of the Westmont and Vermont Vista neighborhoods.
L. Christopher Caver Jr., 38, shows a scar on his stomach, a result of a 2012 shooting when he was hit seven times inside his car. He has lived in the Westmont area of South L.A. for more than a decade.
People hang out in front of a pawn shop along Vermont Avenue and 83rd Street in the Westmont area of South Los Angeles.
A woman and child walk down an alley between 93rd and 94th streets in Westmont. The 1.8-square-mile area has seen 100 homicides in the last seven years.
A German shepherd stands sentry in the front yard of a home in the Westmont area of South Los Angeles.
“I’m just fed up in this area,” said Aaron Eden, 38, about crime in his neighborhood. His house has been broken into twice, the Westmont resident said.

Some self-styled crusaders of justice cite deceiving statistics to hold up the edifice of rampant racism.  Weaknesses in their assertions abound.  For instance, their comparisons of crime to population over a broad space hide a serious problem in certain sectors.  The overall crime number in a specific locale may register no concern since the good numbers coming out of some neighborhoods depress the frightening stats emerging from others.  Examine the maps for New York City, Chicago, and Milwaukee. (2)

Source: City of New York crime map
Source: Chicago Tribune
Source: Milwaukee Police Department

The theme throughout is the same: the highest crime rates occur in the locations with the highest concentrations of poverty.  These areas correspond with the greatest assemblage of ethnic and racial minorities.  The higher the incidence of crime, the greater the opportunity for run-ins with police for people of a particular hue who predominate in these places.  We have a crime problem within certain sectors of our population, not a police problem.

Such subtleties might not course through the mind of an athlete whose life has been spent focusing on other things.  The field is  wide open for pop-culture grandees or media-savvy racialists to set the tone for the ill-informed.

Some may sound reasonable like Killer Mike above, but they still repeat a now well-worn mantra of a generalized campaign of racial injustice.  Rapper T.I. pontificates, “Police brutality is really just a tentacle to a larger problem — the racial divide and the systemic racism that goes on from the highest of highs to the lowest of the low of society in America.” (3)

And of course we have Al Sharpton, the race hustlers’ version of the legal profession’s ambulance chaser.  Here he is whipping up the congregation after the 2014 Ferguson shooting.

For many quick to have their biases confirmed, facts on the ground can be inconvenient.  As it turned out, the deceased in Ferguson was no saint (see below).  So much so, Pres. Obama’s Justice department, always on the hunt for the ghost of Bull Connor or Jim Crow, couldn’t gin up a case against the officer.  No facts, no case – to borrow a much abused cadence.

After Ferguson, a movement was born: Black Lives Matter.  Out of the garbage can, also, is resurrected the old conjoining of “cops” and “pigs”.

Like a teen girl watching the Emmies, the fashion is picked up by the impressionable tuning in.  Thus is born Colin Kaepernick  as self-anointed conscience of the NFL.

Kaepernick’s infamous socks as worn during an August 2016 practice.
Former Green Beret Nate Boyer, second from right, stands next to a kneeling Colin Kaepernick during the national anthem on Thursday Night Football, 2016. (Chris Carlson / Associated Press)

The case of Colin Kaepernick is interestingly instructive.  Having shown no prior desire to publicly pontificate as a SJW, all of a sudden he’s kneeling during the national anthem and brandishing cops-as-pigs socks.  More than a few have speculated on the influence of his fiance/girlfriend, Nessa Diab.

Nessa Diab and Colin Kaepernick on the way to the gym, September 2017.

Most recently, she spouted off on Ray Lewis’s suggestion that Kaepernick keep his opinions private as Kaepernick was being considered by owner Steve Bisciotti for a position on the roster.  She implicitly referred to Lewis as a “house negro” to Bisciotti’s slaveholder on Twitter.

Nessa’s tweet: Bisciotti/Lewis above, deCaprio/Samuel J. Jackson from “Django Unchained” below.

She’s quite the pollinating bee fluttering from the blue-dot worlds of celebrity, MTV, San Francisco, and a DJ gig at the HOT97 in New York City.  She seems to have a thing for 49er players after dating Aldon Smith.  She’s also fully immersed in the lingo of the left.  Here she is commenting on the shooting death of Alton Sterling:

Imagine the victim #AltonSterling as your brother, father, son, cousin, friend, co-worker. You didn’t have to know him personally to feel this horrific pain. This is a MAN who wrongfully got murdered!!! Don’t let this “system” now criminalize Alton Sterling to help justify these coward actions by the police. They will try and they will also try to discredit the store owner’s account of what occurred because he’s Muslim and we know Islamaphobia is at an all time high in this country.

This kind of stuff isn’t hard to find in her social media posts.

Celebrities like Nessa Diab arrive at the 2015 MTV Movie Awards held at Nokia Theatre LA Live in Los Angeles, California on April 12, 2015.

As a Muslim and familiar with Saudi Arabia, she should be aware that her chic glam would attract the attention of the Mutaween, the kingdom’s religious police, if she traipsed around in Riyadh’s nightlife in her figure-hugging and revealing sartorial beauty.

Women in Burkas, in Mina near the Saudi holy city of Mecca, Saudi Arabia in 2011.

Bringing a Bible into the country is a crime; women can’t get driver’s licenses; and the public dress code for women centers on the burka.  It’d certainly be hard for her to display her natural endowments robed like above.

You’d think that she would have greater appreciation for life in the good ol’ USA.  Instead, she treats a multiracial country of 330 million experiencing the rare  police shooting as if it is a hotbed of racial bigotry.  She ignores the nature of life in dar al-islam (lit. territory of Islam).  The lack of any sense of proportion is a hallmark of the ignorant.  But nonetheless, she appears to be an influence on poor Colin.

A little digging by Colin and Nessa would undermine their jihad.  Blacks are not shot or otherwise accosted by police in a broadly unjust fashion.  If anything, they are disproportionately represented in the incidence of crime, particularly of the violent kind.  And their victims are disproportionately black. (6)  Yes, black lives matter, and, for their lives to matter, police need to seize their assailants … who happen to be disproportionately black.  No wonder the high number of police confrontations with blacks, overwhelmingy male.

Yet, in the recent high-profile police shooting cases, few have resulted in convictions of the officers.  Some hustlers use the fact as conclusive evidence of something airily called “systemic” racism.  In other words, these pantomimes of racial justice want convictions no matter what.  If so, why bother with a trial if media buzz is enough to condemn?

Prosecutor Henry Harvey (r), played by Dana Andrews, and murder suspect John Waldron (Arthur Kennedy) in “Boomerang!” from 1947.

The matter was brought into clearer focus while watching the movie “Boomerang!”.  It’s the story of a prosecutor who refused to pursue charges against a murder suspect after being subjected to intense political pressure.  The DA couldn’t remove from his mind the legal profession’s standards of ethical conduct for prosecutors.  Put succinctly, “The duty of the prosecutor is to seek justice, not merely to convict.” (7)  Is it asking too much to demand a similar sobriety in the celebrity world and the media-incited mobs?

Pres. Trump at campaign rally for Sen. Luther Strange, September 22, 2017.

Well, into the frenzy jumps Pres. Trump.  Echoing the thoughts of many, speaking at a campaign rally for US Sen. Luther Strange, he said, “Wouldn’t you love to see one of these NFL owners, when someone disrespects our flag to say, `Get that son of a bitch off the field right now! Out. He’s fired! He’s fired!“ (8)  Leaving aside the language, the sentiment has currency among many – if not most – veterans and a sizable swath of the country’s population, mostly in “red” America.  Undoubtedly, the comment angered some of the marginally inclined in the locker room.  So, we experienced the NFL’s own “black Sunday” on September 24.  Here’s a sample.

Buffalo Bills take a knee, September 24.
Jacksonville Jaguars take a knee, September 24.
Indianapolis Cols take a knee, September 24.
Some of the Chargers resort to the old black power salute.
Several New England Patriots players kneel during the national anthem before an NFL football game against the Houston Texans, Sunday, Sept. 24, 2017, in Foxborough, Mass. (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)

It happened throughout the NFL on that day.  And it drew criticism from fans.

In a debate on MSNBC between Brian Mitchell and Hugh Hewitt, Hewitt raises the scepter of the NFL losing touch with its fan base.  As for Mitchell, he accepts the received wisdom of a pervasive racism.  Take a look.

Some like Brian Mitchell  see the players’ actions with all the integrity of The Grand Remonstrance of 1641.  In 1641, the English Parliament presented to King Charles I a list of grievances, The Grand Remonstrance, which His Highness quickly dismissed.  The result was over 40 years of civil war and social disruption.  The players’ protest could do the same by inaugurating a civil war between the league and its fans.  I don’t think the league will come out of it any better than Charles I.  He lost his head.

The execution of Charles I, 1649.

The full effect of the protests will take awhile to gestate.  The players have certainly displayed their right to free speech, and some fans are exhibiting the same right.  Free speech for everyone, including the right to express that speech in the abandonment of the NFL.  Many prescient owners and players can envision dollars whisking out of their wallets like so many autumn leaves on a windy day.

Could the NFL players’ racialized outcry have the same fallout as the 1994 baseball players’ strike on Major League Baseball?  A person could argue that Major League Baseball hasn’t fully recovered from it.  What waits in the offing for the NFL?  Much depends on the NFL’s response to players using the national anthem as a forum to present their social and political discontents.

Entire Cowboys’ team kneels before the national anthem on Monday Night Football, September 25.

Sensing the trouble, Jerry Jones of the Dallas Cowboys knelt with the players and then everybody stood for the anthem.  A compromise, but why kneel?  What’s the reason for the kneeling?  Is it to show solidarity for a broad charge of racism for which there is no valid proof?  What’s the point?

The whole thing rests on a premise without much of a foundation.  Indeed, it’s cause without a cause.  To be clearer, it’s a political movement without much justification.  Thus, any compromise gives credence to a sham.

RogerG

Bibliography and sources:

  1. “South Vermont Avenue: L.A. County’s ‘death alley’”, Nicole Santa Cruz and Ken Schwencke, Los Angeles Times, 1/19/2014, photos by Genaro Molina, http://homicide.latimes.com/post/westmont-homicides/
  2.  “The Debate Over Crime Rates is Ignoring the Metric That Matters Most: ‘Murder Inequality’: Focusing on the neighborhood level is the best way to understand violence in America. Here are six charts that prove it.”, Daniel Kay Hertz, The Trace,  7/25/2016,  https://www.thetrace.org/2016/07/crime-rates-american-cities-murder-inequality/
  3. “T.I. speaks out on police brutality”, Deena Zuru, CNN, 8/14/2017,   http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/24/politics/ti-us-or-else-movie-police-brutality/index.html
  4. “CLASSY: Kaepernick’s Girlfriend Compares NFL Owners to Slaveholders, Ray Lewis to ‘House Negroes'”, Eliot Hamilton, The DailyWire, 8/3/2017,  http://www.dailywire.com/news/19319/classy-kaepernicks-girlfriend-compares-nfl-owners-elliott-hamilton#
  5. “COLIN KAEPERNICK: EXPLAINS PIG COP SOCKS
    … Shot At ‘Rogue Cops'”, TMZ Sports, 9/1/2016,  http://www.tmz.com/2016/09/01/colin-kaepernick-cop-pig-socks-rogue-cops/
  6. “The lies of Black Lives Matter”, Kelly Riddell, The Washington Times, 7/18/2016,  http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/18/lies-black-lives-matter/
  7. “Criminal Justice Standards; Prosecution Function, Part I, General Standards”,  https://www.americanbar.org/publications/criminal_justice_section_archive/crimjust_standards_pfunc_blk.html#1.2
  8. “Trump Calls on NFL Owners to Fire Players Who Kneel During Anthem”, Daniel Politi, Slate, 9/23/2017,   http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/09/23/trump_calls_on_nfl_owners_to_fire_players_who_kneel_during_anthem.html
Posted on

Recommendations for Avoiding the Disease that Knows No “Red” or “Blue”

The following is an email exchange with a dear friend over my post, “The Disease That Knows No ‘Red’ or ‘Blue’ Boundaries”.

My friend complimented the post but wanted some specific recommendations.

My response:

Yep, you’re right.  No recommendations.  Yet, it’s purpose was to establish the existence of a fiasco, much like the 1986 Challenger disaster.  If everyone had blinders attached to their eyes, we’d continue to shoot people up into space without repairing the design flaw.  NASA’s graveyard (if they have one) would be more heavily populated.  Same with our nation’s systems of schools.  Do we really recognize the thoroughness of the rot?  Quite understandably, parents desperately search for the best options for their kids.  The problem: the best options are mostly window-dressed routes to, once again, mediocrity.  It’s everywhere from pre-school to grad school, from the ghetto kid living among the social chaos to the legions enrolled in the college curriculum’s assault on classical instruction and the relentless infusion of the identity nonsense and calling it scholarship.  The situation cries for a storming of the Bastille.
Here’s some recommendations … if you want them:
  • If a classical education is desired, look for a school – secondary to college – with a curriculum based on the great books.
  • Electoral politics gave us the people who sanctioned and produced the nightmare, and electoral politics is the essential route to the antidote.  Elect people who will work to decertify the ed schools and force a return to a classical instruction.  No greater advance in education can be accomplished than to remove the monopoly power of the college ed schools.  Leave John Dewey to rot in the grave, and stop trying to resurrect him in the naive minds of the young.
  • Don’t start, right out of the gate, with any reform with utopian titles like “No child left behind” or “All students will succeed”.  Anything implying “all” should be reserved for thoughts of heaven and the pew.  Fact: “All” students won’t succeed!  The attempt to do so has led to unending reforms and a never-ending teat for the consultancy class.  If nomenclature is your thing, “all” should be replaced by “removal” of some.  The school must be made safe for the scholar and the scholar-to-be.
  • Speaking of scholars, let’s produce some and place them in the front of the classroom.  Of course, “scholar” should be a reference to one with his/her head screwed on straight, with feet planted in the here-and-now.  A school is no place for the airy effete with pretensions of an ethereal and secular paradise.  To produce adult scholars, out goes [fill in the blank] Studies Departments – and with it, all the tolerance/multicultural crap.  Real minds require an introduction to the great minds.  Sorry, they aren’t distributed according to the likes of Maxine Waters and the Congressional Black Caucus.
  • Not everyone is cut out for formal, classroom instruction and its subsequent route to slipshod cognitive development. Recognize that some kids like working with their hands.  Better a cutting torch in their hand than a knife at the throat of a convenience store owner.  I’ve always been a strong advocate of professionally-approved apprenticeships with the trade unions and businesses.
  • Let’s stop the feminization of pedagogy and the curriculum.  Make education more attractive to boys.  Cut out all the grouping; end co-ed PE; and return to instructing the natural inclinations of a discipline.  Those “natural inclinations” are obvious.  History should be taught with an eye to the great men/women, great events, and littered with the great stories that define us.  Instructional periods might have to be limited to 45 minutes to avoid the male ants-in-the-pants syndrome.  For the Language Arts, classical literature should be the touchstone.  The Iliad and the Odyssey is a great war story.  Teach a vernacular version.  The same is true of much of Shakespeare.  It’s better to a know a few great books well than the cover stories of Time magazine.  Of course, these old authors are a bit prickly to the ears of your average snowflake in the staff, desk, and professoriate.   To hell with ’em!
  • Back-to-School Night should be reserved for teaching the ins-and-outs of being a tiger mom.  Lock up the video games.  Better yet, do a buy-back thing like the one for guns.  All tekkie communication stuff should be embargoed and computers placed in the community section of the house.  One parent must be home at all times.  Parents should read, read anything so they can be seen by the kids.  TV should be limited to a single planned-for program, like a person does with a movie.  After that, it’s turned off.  It should never be allowed to be a constant background noise.
Just some ideas … if it’s recommendations that you want.
RogerG
Posted on

The Disease That Knows No “Red” Or “Blue” Boundaries

 

Unsurprisingly and generally speaking, parents strive to grease the skids for their kids’  future success.  Particularly, middle class parents will drive themselves to near bankruptcy in order to guarantee their offspring’s advancement.  Yet, when they buy into a nicer neighborhood to enroll junior in a “better” school, are they really getting a “better” school?  There’s good reason to doubt that proposition.  Much of the corruption in our schools has deep tentacles, and is no respecter of “red” vs. “blue” states, public or private schools, inner city or suburban schools, parochial or secular, and even reaches down into home-schooling.   It’s equal-opportunity corruption.

I suppose that the issue hinges on what is meant by “better”.

Sure, avoidance of gang rape in the school’s bathroom, classrooms-as-battlefields, and the accidental straying beyond the school’s chain link fence into feral environs are legitimate parental concerns.  Many parents would assign “better” to any school without these traits.

Under the belief that a geographic relocation might improve things for the munchkins, many parents can’t wait to hook up the U-haul and move to a richer zip code.

A moving truck is shown at a house that was sold in Palo Alto, Calif., Tuesday, June 19, 2012. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

However, zip codes of the affluent present their own problems, leaving aside the schools.  Websites catering to the school-conscious parent have sprung up in places afflicted with a cost of living commensurate with Warren Buffett’s investment portfolio but many people possessing a net worth more in line with the denizens of 1950’s Levittown.  California is a hotbed for these conversations.  One site for Bay Area moms and dads,  berkeleyparentsnetwork.org, is filled with advice such as “Of course, if you can afford to buy in a place with good schools then by all means buy.” (12)  Though for most Californios, being able to make the rent, or mortgage, hangs overhead like the sword of Damocles.

Some have opted to jump ship and leave the state.  For many, housing costs are just too big an obstacle to overcome in the quest for better family environs, including schools.  From 2000 to 2009, the SF Bay Area  registered a net outflow of 600,000 domestic migrants (mostly citizens, not immigrants).  After a 5-year pause due to falling house prices from the Great Recession, the exodus resumed as shelter resumed  its eye-popping California norm (house prices returning to 6x’s income, beyond the acceptable 3x’s).  The 2016 losses for the whole state were on the order of 110,000, most of it from the heavily populated but very expensive coastal enclaves. (9)

Those “domestic migrants” – residents of one state moving to another – seem to be emerging from states with uniform ID: those with the adjective “high” before cost-of-living, taxes, crime, and regulation, and “low” for upward mobility and successful business formation.  The usual suspects are California, Illinois, New York, et al.

Destinations are South and West — EXCLUDING CALIFORNIA!  Look at the top and bottom of the chart below.  The top is reserved for the welcoming states and the bottom for states that shed people like my dog does hair. (15)

Interestingly, the combination of escalating house prices and California’s hostility to suburban living is making for a return of feudal manorialism.  A fleeing middle class, sensitive to rising prices for a family hearth, in combination with foreign immigration into the state (2.7 million “undocumented” live in the state – see 13 below), is resurrecting something resembling a lord/serf society.  Two researchers characterized the situation like this: “Essentially, the model [for California] is that of a gated community, with a convenient servant base nearby.” (9)

“Convenient servant base”?  Sounds much like “serf”, or maybe peasant, to me.  “Gated community”?  Sounds like “castle”, or chateau.

Is this a French manor from the Middle Ages or contemporary California?
Gated development, Carlsbad, California.
East Los Angeles neighborhood.

For many, moving for better schools and a more affordable roof most likely means leapfrogging the state entirely.  But don’t delude yourself into equating a middle or upper class student body in a new state with a high quality education.  Housing is cheaper but the vast majority of schools are likely, at best, to be only marginally better.  The only real difference between the middle class kid and inner-city one is the poor kid’s path to mediocrity is a lot rockier.  Yes, a mediocre curriculum and poor teacher training awaits all irrespective of better cars in the student parking lot or a student enrollment that’ll do the homework.

Students listening to Ernest Jenkins III in his Manhood Development class at Oakland High School. Credit Jim Wilson/The New York Times
Suburban school in school uniforms.

All schools draw from the same pool of teacher candidates and curricular resources.  You’ll find the same textbooks on a home-schooler’s kitchen table as you will find in a Catholic school classroom and a suburban or inner-city public school.  The vast majority of teachers are given a remarkably homogeneous college education and teacher training centering on the mind-numbing writings of John Dewey.  The sameness is quite remarkable.

30 years worth of experience  as a public high school and community college teacher has made me aware of the phenomenal uniformity of what is taught, how it is taught, and who is teaching it.

Two textbooks that were a staple of 20 years of high school instruction and widely adopted are displayed below.

A widely-adopted World History textbook.
Ditto U.S. History text.

Over the years, textbooks have declined in narrative with a surge in graphics.  Technical, thought-provoking theory has disappeared.  Identity politics is amply displayed: for instance, out goes Henry Bessemer and in comes Mary Wollstonecraft.  Much space is reserved for our historical sins as these crowd out the richness of debate over the nature of our federal system.  Labor history is reduced to a Marxist distillation; excluded is the role  of violent anarcho-socialists in some of that history.  Immigration and immigrants, of course, are always saintly.  The 1960’s reads as if it was cleansed through the censors of the radical left.  I could go on.

For pedagogy, teacher trainees are immersed in the mind of John Dewey.  Who’s John Dewey?  He’s a turn-of-the-century socialist who wanted to turn the schools into factories for making socialists.

Prof. John Dewey at Columbia University.

He’s famous for such arcane mumbo-jumbo as “constructivism” and seemingly commonsensical “child-centered learning”.  The “construction” in “constructivism” is simply the matter of raising (or constructing) the child’s receptivity to socialism.  “Child-centered” is an assault on the established canon of western civilization.  The child’s wants are the guide to instruction, not Plato, the Apostle Paul, or the Founders.  The teacher as the adult in the room is to be replaced by the chaos of adolescent urges.

Howard Gardner dispensing his gospel in India.

On this foundation is built the everyone-wins-a-trophy philosophy of “multiple intelligences” via Howard Gardner.  Everybody is assumed to be smart, but in reality nobody is smart … if you think about it.  The whole thing is a levelling of all students.  From this we get the dilution of the curricular core to include excursions into all the “intelligences” to the detriment of a traditional core.  It’s conducive to “heterogeneity” and grouping in almost everything.

About that “grouping”, “cooperative learning” are watchwords.  Kids are thrust together into groups of varying abilities – the “heterogeneity” thing – and responsibility is socialistically distributed.  What better way to “construct” the new child for the socialist future?  Keep this in mind as your kid comes home with stories of his or her classroom group.

Don’t think for a moment that AP courses are immune to these influences.  AP Literature guidelines now reflect Dewey’s “child-centered” nonsense.  AP US History deemphasizes a mastery of historical facts and their connections.  They demand mature judgments from immature minds.  Across the curriculum, we’re creating opinionated ignoramuses.

It didn’t take long for me to realize that our professional goal wasn’t Jefferson’s ideal of an educated citizenry.  It’s about making good little Democrats — by Democrats, I mean the Democratic Party as part of the consortium of the world’s Social Democratic Parties.  Read “socialist” for Social Democrat … mostly of the mild sort.

The kids’ minds have long been pried open to being college snowflakes and Antifa recruits.  Intolerant and propagandized since shortly after becoming bipedal, many of them are now subjecting us to their partisan and ideologically-laced rhetoric.  The rhetoric supplants mature thinking.

Listen to this exchange between a taxi driver and his youthful customer over a hula doll on his dashboard.  Count the number of times political boilerplate and the word “offensive” is used by the female rider.

We are reaping the whirlwind as tantrums and thuggishness displace reasoned debate.

We are witnessing the results of 4-5 decades of a blinkered and tendentious instruction.  It has penetrated nearly everywhere.  Buying a home in a better neighborhood will buy you a preppy student body; it won’t guarantee you a education free of the bacillus.  Fleeing a blue state to a red one won’t change the dynamic.  A private or parochial school might only provide a safer and more accomplished route to mediocrity.  Home schooling might be an option if the curriculum can be kept free of the college ed schools and government’s embrace of identity politics, an unlikely occurrence.

Education reformers are everywhere, and have been arising zombie-like throughout my career.  Yet, reform seems to always originate from the same worn out premises.  We’ve reached the point that real education reform may require us to ignore the reformers.  Unless it happens, we had all better keep an eye on Tommy (see below).

RogerG

Bibliography and sources:

  1. Interesting and brief account of treating inner city school students: “An Inner City School Social Worker Shares Two of His Cases”, Howard Honigsfeld, Psychotherapy Networker,  7/28/2015, https://www.psychotherapynetworker.org/blog/details/607/therapy-strategies-for-working-with-underprivileged.
  2. An account of the challenges in an Oklahoma urban school: “A look inside an inner city school struggling with multiple challenges, including ‘needing improvement’ sanctions”, Danniel Parker, The City Sentinel,  5/15/2011, http://city-sentinel.com/2011/05/a-look-inside-an-inner-city-school-struggling-with-multiple-challenges-including-%E2%80%9Cneeding-improvement%E2%80%9D-sanctions/.
  3. Interesting advice in teaching inner city students: “4 Tips to Being a Good Teacher in the Inner-City”, The Libertarian Republic, 11/11/2014,   http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/4-tips-good-teacher-inner-city/
  4. Excellent maps showing  a changing Los Angeles ethnic demography from 1940 to 2000: “Los Angeles County Ethnic/Racial Breakdown 1940-2000”,   http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=169073.0.
  5. “White Flight Never Ended”, Alana Semuels, The Atlantic, 7/30/2015,  https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/07/white-flight-alive-and-well/399980/.
  6. “Data shows how major U.S. cities are slowly re-segregating”, Kenya Downs, 3/7/2016, PBS NewsHour,  http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/major-u-s-cities-may-seem-integrated-but-not-for-long/.
  7. A synopsis of John Dewey’s harmful impact on American education can be found in this critical review of Henry Edmondson’s book, John Dewey and the Decline of American Education, Dennis Attick, PhD candidate in Social Foundations of Education at Georgia State University,  http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=eandc. The author is clearly supportive of the major tenets of Dewey’s education philosophy.
  8. For an account of the most widely adopted textbooks in today’s America go here: “Widely Adopted History Textbooks”, American Textbook Council,  http://historytextbooks.net/adopted.htm.
  9. A summary of recent migration trends for California can be found here: “Leaving California? After slowing, the trend intensifies”, Joel Kotkin and Wendell Cox, The Orange County Register, 4/23/2017,  http://www.ocregister.com/2017/04/23/leaving-california-after-slowing-the-trend-intensifies/.
  10. Metrics of school quality don’t vary that much for schools within the same school district is asserted here: “Do Better Neighborhoods for
    MTO Families Mean Better Schools?”, Brief No. 3; Kadija S. Ferryman, Xavier de Souza Briggs, Susan J. Popkin, and María Rendón; The Urban Institute, March 2008,   https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/31596/411639-Do-Better-Neighborhoods-for-MTO-Families-Mean-Better-Schools-.PDF.  ** The metrics for measuring school quality were performance on state exams, the school’s poverty rate, and exposure to white classmates and students with limited English proficiency.
  11. ** “Our kids are still in early elementary school too but I think you will find the answer varies widely. Obviously… not ”everyone” can go to private school! I know some parents who have had their kids just tough it out at a not-so-great middle school, then get a scholarship for private high school. Others with more resources opt to start private school earlier on. And, even some high earning families I know chose Oakland public high schools including Skyline, Oakland Tech, and charter schools. Ultimately it’s hard to say before your child starts school, what type of high school will work for your family. That said, we chose our home based on both elementary and middle schools we liked, at least ”on paper” as you say, figuring high school was too far off to gauge.”; from “Moving for the Schools”, Berkeley Parents Network, August 2012,  https://www.berkeleyparentsnetwork.org/recommend/housing/schools.
  12. Ibid. From the segment “Moving vs. private school – how to make the decision?”.
  13. “II. Where Do They Live?”, Jeffrey S. Passel and D’Vera Cohn, Pew Research Center, 4/14/2009,  http://www.pewhispanic.org/2009/04/14/ii-where-do-they-live/.
  14. “5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S.”, FactTank: News in the Numbers, Pew Research Center, 4/27/2017,  http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/27/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/.
  15. “California, Illinois, and New York Keep Losing People to Other States”, Ryan McMaken, Mises Wire, 5/10/2017, Mises Institute,  https://mises.org/blog/california-illinois-and-new-york-keep-losing-people-other-states
Posted on

Substituting Their Judgment: Lesson 2 from “The Earth is Weeping: The Epic Story of the Indian Wars for the American West”

The Progressives’ zeal to mold people to fit an ideologically-driven stereotype is abundantly evident today as it was in the latter 19th century.  Back then, the recipient of their benignly intended efforts – but with malign results – was the American Indian.  Today, the target is the entire American population, if not the world’s.  The modern Progressives’ gaze became vastly more panoramic as they substitute their judgment for the wishes of anyone directly impacted.

Connecting Progressivism’s dots between the 19th and 21st centuries isn’t hard.  Progressivism wasn’t a product of spontaneous combustion.  It’s got a lineage – or, if you will, a trail of tears.  Its 19th century roots became evident just as one expansive civilization began to swamp a nomadic one.  The Progressives of the era – call them “reformers” with their Obama-esque “arc of history” rhetoric – planned a quick transformation of the American Indian into rural gentry.  The tinkering with humanity ensued and misery erupted.

Nathan C. Meeker, previously mentioned in another post, was one example of an archetype littered about the civilian branches of the U.S. government.  Many were utopian, and near utopian, in outlook with a powerful confidence in their ability to engineer better human beings.  The American Indian seemed to be the preferred guinea pig in their social laboratory.

Vincent Colyer

Another scion in the Progressive line was Vincent Colyer, the Indian Board of Commissioners secretary.  In a 1871 “peacemaking” tour of New Mexico and Arizona reservations, he upset a happy arrangement for the Chihenne band of Apaches and all others concerned.  They were ordered from their much-loved Canada Alamosa reservation (sometimes called Ojo Caliente) in the New Mexico territory to the more inhospitable Tularosa valley, a hundred miles northwest.  Colyer simply substituted his judgment for the Chihennes.  He would set off an Apache/US conflagration that would sputter on and off for 15 years and only ended with the capture of Geronimo in 1886 and decimation of half the Chiricahua Apache population.

Chiricahua Apaches, 1880s.
Apaches on the San Carlos Reservation waiting in line for government rations, 1870s.
Chiricahua prisoners, including Geronimo (front row, 3rd from right) being transported to Ft. Marion, Fla., 1886.

“Substituting their judgment” is a common trait of those consumed with the self-perception of possessing superior wisdom.  It is the blind spot of the Progressive.  Their unquestioning faith in the “expert” is without limit.  Jump forward to the middle of the 20th century and we have “urban renewal”.

What started out as “slum clearance” ended up as slum intensification.  Social planners – an established squadron in the ranks of the nomenklatura – substituted the haphazard arrangements of neighborhood residents for Sovietized housing monoliths and called it “urban renewal”.  In 1954, they gave us Pruitt-Igoe in St. Louis.

Pruitt-Igoe (actually Wendell O. Pruitt Homes and William Igoe Apartments) just before completion and its first occupancy in 1954.

It didn’t last 20 years.  By the end of the 1960s, it was uninhabitable and a massive eyesore.  Its chief architect, Minuro Yamasaki, exclaimed, “I never thought people were that destructive”.  The thing was demolished in 1972.

Pruitt-Igoe, 1970.
Pruitt-Igoe, 1969.
The demolition of Pruitt-Igoe in 1972.

If there was a FBI most-wanted list for such things, the following grandiose public housing projects would join Pruitt-Igoe (see 7 below):

  • Queens Bridge Houses, Queens, NYC.  It was raided in 2005 as the home of the “Dream Team” drug syndicate.
  • Robert Taylor Homes, Chicago, Il.  In an already crime-plagued city, Robert Taylor displays some of the highest rates of violent crime and gang activity in the city.
  • Jordan Downs, Watts, Ca.  Crime and gang violence are its watchwords for today.
  • Magnolia Projects, or “Da Wild Magnolia”, New Orleans, La.  Let’s just say that the place’s reputation isn’t conducive to raising kids.
  • Marcy Projects, Brooklyn, NYC.  Rapper Jay-Z, a former resident, wrote the rap “Murder Marcyville” as an anthem to its atmosphere.  Need I say more?
  • Cabrini Green, Chicago, Il.  No list of the infamous should go without this lovely specimen.  Prior to its closing in 2010, USA Today called the place a “virtual war zone, the kind of place where little boys were gunned down on their way to school and little girls were sexually assaulted and left for dead in stairwells.”

The benighted gaze of the “expert” isn’t limited to housing.  They’ve destroyed entire swaths of cities in the name of “redevelopment”.  A similar roster of the infamous could be constructed for this imperial march of eminent domain’s elimination of private property (see 5 and 6).  Lost in the imbroglio is the unique character of a place, evolved over many years of human interaction, only to see it replaced by a modern sterility.  This is devolution, not evolution, thanks to the Progressives’ “experts”.

Not happy with fiddling with the cities, under the guise of “climate change”, the “experts” want to bring to all of society what they brought to the urban landscape.  Climate change is so protean of a concept that it will abet almost any government meddling in our existence.  Now here’s a mandate for the know-it-alls.

California is the epicenter for this latest craze among Progressives.  “Climate change” enthusiasms have made the place almost unlivable for anyone aspiring to the middle class.  Utility bills and fuel prices are exorbitant.  Solar panels are everywhere but that is only possible with a ponzi scheme of subsidies and utility rate manipulation.

The place is so regulated that even getting a plastic bag to carry your groceries to the car demands another purchase … or, alternatively, bring your own filthy things from home.  Owning and maintaining a car is now a grueling experience.  Illegality might await if you buy a water heater outside your air district.  Expressing the desire to start a business could be justifiable grounds for an insanity declaration and commitment to a state institution.

And, of course, the tax burden is back-breaking.  No surprise here since the expert-driven paradise is an expensive proposition.

The invisible hand of Adam Smith becomes a deadening hand if it is attached to a Progressive “expert”.  In their wake, we have the plight of the American Indian, the inner-city poor, and the California middle class.  If success is measured by failure, a place like Sacramento – or any blue dot on the 2016 election map – should have a hall of fame, or shame, dedicated to the Progressive “expert”.

RogerG

Bibliography and sources:

  1. For a history of Apache resistance, read The Earth Is
    Weeping: The Epic Story of the Indian Wars for the American West    , Peter Cozzens, hardback edition, pp. 358-415.
  2. A good survey of early urban renewal efforts can be found in “The History of Hamlin Park Part VII: Early Housing Acts and Start of Urban Renewal”, Mike Puma, Buffalo Rising, 9/23/2013,  https://www.buffalorising.com/2013/09/the-history-of-hamlin-park-part-vii-early-housing-acts-and-the-start-of-urban-renewal/
  3. More on Pruitt-Igoe in wikipedia, “Pruitt-Igoe”,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruitt%E2%80%93Igoe
  4. An early criticism of “urban renewal” from 1965 can be found here: “The Failure of Urban Renewal”, Herbert J. Ganns, Commentary, 4/1/1965,  https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-failure-of-urban-renewal/
  5. More on “urban renewal” failures: “5 Disastrous Urban Renewal Failures”, Modern Cities, 3/10/2016,  http://www.moderncities.com/article/2016-mar-5-disastrous-urban-renewal-failures-/page/1
  6. More on “urban renewal” failures: “Redevelopment Wrecks: 20 failed Projects Involving Eminent Domain Abuse”, Castle Coalition,  http://castlecoalition.org/pdf/publications/Redevelopment%20Wrecks.pdf
  7. “The 7 Most Infamous U.S. Public Housing Projects”, Newsone staff, Newsone,  https://newsone.com/1555245/most-infamous-public-housing-projects/
Posted on

Journalism as Wish-Fulfillment

Sonam Sheth, politics and national security reporter at Business Insider, from her Twitter page.

While scanning Yahoo news, I ran into an article by Sonam Sheth (pictured above) of Business Insider about Trump’s pardoning  of Joe Arpaio, the sheriff accused of challenging one judge’s definition of the amorphous abstraction of “racial profiling”.  What was presented as a straight-up news piece was essentially a stitched together product of lefty wish-fulfillment.  The article went along a boozy path from the pardon to Trump-as-mafioso.  Journalism isn’t journalism any longer.  It’s fevered imaginations run wild.

To grasp the pitiful state of journalism, let’s go on a journey through Sheth’s personal profile.  It will illuminate a lot about her unconscious – or conscious –  mingling of bits of hard news with barnstorming lefty politicization.  This will be brief.

Her’s is a compressed odyssey from a Rutgers University classroom to a couple of extensions of the classroom in internships and a “columnist” for the college newspaper.  While in the college cocoon, she had a 3-month layover with Citizen Action of New York.  Currently, Citizen Action is one of the lefty activist groups in the vanguard of The Resistance.  Check out these gems of left wing boilerplate from the website:

“Build the Movement. Add Your Name to the Restistance Rapid Response: We’re building the statewide movement we need to take on Trump and make health care for all a reality. Build it with us.”

“Gov. Cuomo: Stop Trump’s Climate Attack!  While we fight the Trump administration every step of the way in D.C., New York must lead on climate change by transitioning to 100% renewable energy. It’s up to Governor Cuomo.”

There’s more, but you get the idea.

What would attract a future Business Insider staffer to an organization of politically strident lefty activism?  Hmmmm.

Oh well, from there she dropped into a short internship with CNBC and was picked up by Business Insider.  I’m sure that the Rutgers econ degree drew attention with the HR departments, but with the degree comes a load of ideological fixations.  They make it easy to leap from assumption/premise to disjointed fact to conclusion, all in a surreal and dreamy narrative landscape.  It would make Salvador Dali cringe in envy.

Salvador Dali

Now to the article.  The title says it all: “Trump’s decision to pardon Joe Arpaio could be a crucial piece of evidence in the Russia investigation”.  A person could stop with the title and be just as informed.

The article was riddled with so much bounding from point to point that my wife could only hear, as I was reading, my repeated refrain of “This is bull@#$&*!”. The bravo sierra begins with the grasping for a link  between the pardon and hoped-for proof of obstruction of justice.

First, right out of the gate, she constricts Arpaio’s sin as “criminal contempt in July for violating a court order to stop racially profiling Latinos”.  “Racial profiling” is one of those politically loaded terms that are bandied about like a frisbee.  It’s become so expansive that a victim might shy away from using the word “black” to describe a black  assailant.

Besides, Arpaio’s tough illegal immigration stance, and his use of “racial profiling”, might have something to do with the overwhelming type of illegal that a sheriff might confront in a state that shares a border with the Latino world south to the Strait of Magellan.  In effect, the judge is either ordering the sheriff to ignore the rule of law – immigration law that is – or pretend the obvious doesn’t exist as he does so.  Either way, it’s a court-ordered charade.  Trump’s pardon put an end to the judicial lunacy.

Illegal immigrants sit in a group after being detained by U.S. Border Patrol agents in McAllen, Texas. (Associated Press).

For our budding journalist, it may never have occurred to her that an immigration hawk of a presidential candidate has a natural affinity for a sheriff thinking, and doing, the same.  It’s not proof of criminal intent and conspiracy to clear a sheriff from the clutches of an activist judge for carrying out policies in line with the policies and constitutional authority of the president of the United States.  But no, Sheth’s surreal potboiler must take precedence.

From the pardon, she builds the edifice.  In quoting a single source, Renato Marriotti, she tries to weave a story of criminal intent from, once again citing Marriotti, Trump hypothetically “ending investigations as to his friends”.  The presence of “friends” is not evidence of “intent” of criminal conspiracy to “obstruct justice”.  Arpaio isn’t an example of the kind of cronyism typical of the Clintons.  If viewpoint sympathy can be strung into the kind of relationship most typically found in criminal conspiracies, then most assuredly Bill Clinton should be dressed in striped livery for the pardoning of Marc Rich.  There was much more evidence of illicit behavior in that whole unseemly affair.

President Bill Clinton and Denise Rich attend a funraiser for ‘The G & P Charitable Foundation for Cancer Research’ in October 1998, in New York City. (DIANA WALKER/LIAISON)

As for Sheth’s insinuation of  “obstruction of justice”, where’s the underlying crime?  You know, the criminal conduct that a person seeks to hide.  For Bill Clinton, it was perjury in Federal District Court in Arkansas and his subsequent dissembling testimony before a federal grand jury in Washington, DC.  For Trump, as the constitutionally ordained chief executive officer of the United States government, he simply asked about the possibility of ending the investigation of Michael Flynn.  Even here, Sheth can’t present proof of an order by Trump do so.  She’s only got Comey’s “feelings” of pressure.

I’m reminded of my discussions with my teenage sons after they came home late.  Certainly they felt “pressure”.  Am I guilty of “obstruction of justice” simply because they felt “pressure” … but I’m hiding no crime for which the “pressure” is applied?  Sheth’s pseudo-logic enters the realm of the ludicrous.

Of course, lurking behind the curtain is the fantasy of all denizens of the left: the Trump/Russian criminal conspiracy, the philosopher’s stone of explanations for the 2016 election results.  There’s been no evidence of “criminal conspiracy” … up to now.  But, then again, there’s no evidence of an underlying crime in my sitdowns with my clock-challenged sons … up to now.  I can only hope and pray that they never discover Sheth-logic.

Possibly Sheth could benefit from 2 doses of reality.  First, the president is the federal government’s alpha law enforcement officer.  In essence, he’s the chief DA of the federal government.  He can inquire into any investigation under his purview.  It may prove to be embarrassing to his supporters and much fun to his detractors, but voters can deal with that at the next election.  Alan Dershowitz, no card-carrying member of the “vast right-wing conspiracy”, said as much in June of this year (see 6 below).

Furthermore, the president’s pardon power is near absolute.  If Trump so wished, he could pardon the entire roster of inmates in the federal penal system.  He doesn’t even have to wait for convictions to fling the power around.  It may not enhance his electoral viability, but he could do it.

Sheth’s story is a mess.  It is more lefty wish-fulfillment than it is journalism.  It doesn’t even make for good commentary, and more resembles a bad term paper.  As per the old cliché, there’s no there there.  For the Sheths of the world, it’s as if they want to overturn an election with smear-mongering and an endless manipulation of the criminal justice system.  The more appropriate venue for their angst is the ballot box … which, by the way, they have difficulty in winning.

RogerG

Bibliography and sources:

  3. Sonam Sheth Twitter page, https://twitter.com/sonamsays
  4. Citizen Action of New York website, http://citizenactionny.org/
  5. Sonam Sheth’s brief profile at Business Insider website, http://www.businessinsider.com/author/sonam-sheth
  6. “Alan Dershowitz: History, precedent and James Comey’s opening statement show that Trump did not obstruct justice”, Alan Dershowitz and contributor, Washington Examiner, 6/8/2017,  http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-history-precedent-and-james-comeys-opening-statement-show-that-trump-did-not-obstruct-justice/article/2625318
Posted on

Venezuela, Bernie Sanders called; he wants his economic policy back.

Bernie Sanders, American socialist politico extraordinaire.
Nicolas Maduro celebrates election results that give him carte blanche to remake the country’s constitution in his own image.

Remember Obama’s jab at Romney in 2012 for Romney’s suggestion that Russia is a serious threat to our interests? Back then, our too-cool-for-school president said in debate to Romney, “The 1980s called; they want their foreign policy back”. Now, in a tantrum over losing an election, the Dems sound more like Romney than Mr. Too-Cool. Well, the rhetorical gambit can be used in many ways.

Watch the above video. Maduro, the president-for-life – or maybe El Comandante fits the bill – has been implementing Bernie’s economic playbook. The free-stuff economic approach is playing out in the streets, shops, and stomachs of the average Venezuelan.

Caracas grocery store, 2015.

In Cuba, first came the dictatorship, then came the economic ruination. In Venezuela, economic ruination arrived, then the dictatorship. I suppose that Bernie will expound criticism before cameras about Maduro’s means to achieve Bernie’s ends.

Havana neighborhood, 2016.

I often wonder about the academy’s (schools and colleges) delinquency in implanting economic sense in the young. People don’t seem to know the meaning of socialism or its consequences. How else to explain the popularity of Bernie, a softer (and elderly) version of Maduro?

RogerG

Posted on

The 3 Political Parties, Obamacare, and the Bolshevik Revolution

Red Army victory parade, Moscow, 1920.

The closest parallel to the current debacle over the Republican efforts to repeal and replace Obamacare might be the failure of the far more numerous opposition to the Bolsheviks from 1917 to 1920. The divided nature of the opposition spelled their doom and anchored the Bolsheviks in power for over 70 years.

There are 3 effectual political parties in America: (1) the Republican Party, (2) the Semi-Republicans, and (3) the Democratic Party. Like the Whites in the Russian Civil War, the Republicans couldn’t sublimate their pet interests and form a united front to attain the ultimate goal of saving the country from Obamacare.

In contrast, the Democrats acted with the iron discipline of the Lenin-led Bolsheviks. The Bolshevik’s reward was a 70-year lease on power over millions. Could this be ditto for the Democrats?

Bolshevik leadership, 9th Party Congress, 1920.
Congressional Democratic leadership, 2017.

Let there be no mistake: parties #2 and #3 have made it possible for American healthcare to continue to be on a death watch. Escalating premiums, deductibles, and declining participation by medical providers will proceed.

Americans will become acquainted with the truism that health insurance isn’t healthcare. Insurance is a piece of paper that no one need accept, unless the Dems push to enslave the medical industry as the Bolsheviks chained Russians. Are we now to look forward to Medicaid-for-all?

RogerG

Posted on

Man as God

What?  “Man”?  Have I committed a faux pas?  Have I exposed my hidden longing for male hegemony?

“Man” in the title was meant to refer to “humankind”, not the archaic meaning fraught with all kinds of triggers for today’s amped-up sensitivities of some college millennials.  No need to run for the couches and crayons.  Please disband the tantrum mob.   No harm was intended.  The title merely rolls off the tongue easier without too many words and syllables.  I preemptively apologize to the easily offended.

Obsessing over God’s gender has hit the divinity schools. To balance out the deity’s “correct” nature, should we have more images of God as a god-ette? Should the Sistine Chapel ceiling be repainted?

What I really mean to ask is, have we made ourselves God?

Now, with the pronoun battle put to rest (or maybe not), the campaign to invent new sexes – the waste product of divorcing sex, gender, whatever, from genitalia and chromosomes – has made a hash of our language.  Confusion reigns and the hyper-sensitive are on patrol.

No such confusion, however, exists among the mostly urban sophisticates about the reasons for the boy/girl behavioral differences that would be apparent to anyone who happened upon a playground.  While grudgingly having to accept some role for biology – genetic discoveries are too profound to completely ignore – in the nature/nurture battle, it’s really nurture now, nurture all the time, and nurture everywhere.  Social circumstances occupy the pride of place for academic and big media drivel on the subject, the first step in the deification of the person.

The upshot of it all is the psycho-motor reflex among Progressive types to embark on the project to socially engineer away the differences, or to make our boys more like our girls and our girls more like our boys.  To wit, make “man” – or “person-kind” if you will –  the protagonist and prime mover in the Genesis story.

After all, it is asserted, we contrived the social surroundings and, therefore, must be willing to recontrive them more to the zeitgeist of today’s cultural nomenklatura.  The endgame has no end, but is a perpetual crusade to blur distinctions, crown the person as the determiner of all reality, and disembowel institutions and anything old that confer responsibility and restraint.

The passion for the nurture thing lends itself to social fabrication.  It is engineering with human beings as the raw material.  God is no longer the clock-maker of all things.  We are.

National Geographic magazine might be a bellwether of some cosmopolitan thinking on the subject.  In the cover story “Genius” for its May issue, the author, Claudia Kalb, much expounds on the importance of social influences in the production of geniuses.

Really, really smart people, she proclaims, have abetting “social networks”.  Those without, as in all our popularly-identified oppressed classes, suffer the lot of the forgotten.  Women and the poor are two favorites.  As Kalb writes,

“Throughout history women have been denied formal education, deterred from advancing professionally, and under-recognized for their achievements …. People born into poverty or oppression don’t get a shot at working toward anything other than staying alive.” (1)

The point has just enough of a kernel of truth to be dangerous.  The call for coddling social networks is a blank check for all sorts of interventions to even the score.  If women are handcuffed by the world, then spousal roles must be made to change, divorce made easier, the public treasury thrown open, paychecks additionally garnished, and volumes added to the tax and regulatory codes.  The entertainment industry, the courts, and public schools are enlisted for the cause.  Little goes unaffected.

Wonder Woman standing firm and erect, but with a physique that couldn’t crush a marshmallow.

Add a splash of science to the social ingredients and you can also relegate the baggage of moral restraint to the trash heap.  Restraint was implanted by dad’s deadly glare, mom’s firm hand, and a pulpit’s fiery sermons.  From there, it is embedded in the frontal lobes of the brain.  Genius is correlated to creativity and creativity is generated by ignoring those frontal lobes, in Kalb’s rendering (2).  I’m not so sure about Kalb’s causal train of thought but it does relegate the conscience to simply being an impediment to personal self-fulfillment, or “genius”.  Once again, we have more fuel for more social fabrication to blast furnace away objective limits.

Nihilism becomes a factor of social production, or, more accurately, it’s about the annihilation of predetermined forms in favor of a freewheeling rejiggering of reality to match momentary fads of thought.  Old time religion, the nagging voice of the old morality, marriage, and the dictionary must either face social expulsion or be contorted out of all recognition.  As one scholar put it, the scorched earth is in the service of modern Progressivism’s ultimate goal: “the emancipation of the uninhibited self” (3).

The “uninhibited self” knows no restraint.  Even chromosomes are no barrier to any thought, wish, or belief about ourselves.  Don’t worry about science saying otherwise.  The tent of science, faux or otherwise, is big enough to include people willing to wrap an aura of scientific truth around any self-conception.  The gender revolution is born.

National Geographic magazine, January 2017 issue.

It’s a coup d’etat of the mind over the body.  It’s a matter of a person convincing “ze-self” of being something in spite of their body saying otherwise.  What’s next?  Will transgender lead to trans-species?

Welcome to reptile man. Cosmetic surgery and tats can make your body conform to your self-image.

Progressivism is an ally in the “emancipation of the uninhibited self”.  After all, what is Progressivism?  In a nutshell, it is the rosy belief in the power of the state to actualize every person’s highest potential.  The “highest potential” need have no reference to a deity.  The “uninhibited self” is the new deity, and the referee of first and last resort of all things.

Even the limits of the economic principle of scarcity has no relevance in this universe.  The state’s efforts at a takeover of healthcare, for instance, are about leashing the nation’s medical providers to the crusade.  If you have a son living under your roof at age 26, the state will command your medical insurance provider to keep covering him.  And for all those without insurance, the state will deconstruct the whole industry and throw open the public purse to further the fantasy that people have healthcare if they possess a piece of paper with “insurance” printed at the top.  Actually, they have something with as much value as 1923 German marks ($1 =4,210,500,000,000 German marks) .  What good is it if nobody will take it?

Children playing with stacks of marks and a man with a wheel barrow of marks to buy a loaf of bread, 1922 Weimar Republic, Germany.
Post-Obamacare healthcare as government provides it for free to ever larger segments of the U.S. population?

What government is waiting to do for medical care it has done to schooling, motor vehicle management, and the ghetto.  The cost of the “emancipation of the uninhibited self” comes in the form of destroyed lives, wrecked neighborhoods, and classrooms as incubators of good little Democrats and knowers of not much else.

4-6 hours wait time at California DMV offices after the state awards drivers’ licenses to illegal immigrants.
Inside the DMV office is worse.

Government can’t be the agent for liberating the self.  The task is too gargantuan and the goal too pernicious.  And there ain’t enough money.  Maybe Dirty Harry of Clint Eastwood fame said it best:

“A Man’s Got to Know his Limitations” – regarding “man”, that includes the 2 God-created genders as well as the other 24 recently-discovered permutations.

RogerG

Bibliography and sources:

1. “Genius”, Claudia Kalb, National Geographic, May 2017, p. 48-49.

2. Ibid, p. 44.

3. The point was raised in an interview of Larry Arnn, president of Hillsdale College, by Hugh Hewitt on July 4, 2016.  The full conversation can be obtained at http://www.hughhewitt.com/dr-larry-arnn-4th-july-reflection-declaration-lincoln-dr-harry-jaffa/  .