Hagiography and Its Consequences

May be an image of 1 person and text
Charlie Kirk

Case in point: Charlie Kirk.  Right out of the gate, all aglow with power in the aftermath of victory, Kirk, like a tom with his chest bellowed, threatened the new Senate Majority Leader, John Thune, with the following:

“John Thune is now Senate majority leader.  If he does not support President Trump in these next 30 to 45 days to fill President Trump’s cabinet, we will remove him.” (See #1)

Who’s the “we”?  It can’t be the American people.  They didn’t vote for Charlie Kirk to be some sort of Tribune of the People.  It can’t be a majority of the 76 million who voted for Trump.  It’s pure fancy to assume that all of those voters are as enraptured by Donald Trump as he is.  “The lesser of two evils” is a vote against something more than it’s a vote for.  I’ll bet that’s where most of those 76 million reside.  It’s a well-seasoned hunch.

A general distaste for the Democrats isn’t carte blanche for Trump to be crazy.  Indeed, he can’t be any crazier than when he nominated the narcissistic, solipsistic Matt Gaetz, neo-isolationistic Tulsi Gabbard, and the magic-for-medicine RFK, Jr., to be in his cabinet.  Charlie, these aren’t normal people, not normal in the sense that those 76 million would trust huge swaths of the federal bureaucracy in the hands of a young and dimwitted narcissist, a blame-America isolationist, and a kook in charge of Medicare, Medicaid, and the rest of the federal health care Leviathan.  I think that I’m safe in saying that few people voted for this.

May be an image of 3 people and the Oval Office
Gaetz, Trump, JFK, Jr.

And how are you, Charlie, going to accomplish this forced act of fealty?  The Senate isn’t supposed to be an adjunct of the Trump campaign, or an offshoot of Trump’s fickle brain.  Charlie, it’s called separation of powers.  It has the constitutionally guaranteed power of “advice and consent” for offices like these.  Whose advise from the Senate did he seek?  Gaetz/Gabbard/JFK, Jr. were out of the blue.  No one, and I mean no one, had Gaetz, or any of the others, at the top of their list for anything.  If you decide to act looney, don’t be surprised that consent isn’t forthcoming.

Maybe the Senate can save Trump, and the rest of us, from himself.  I suspect that Trump was understandably scarred from his first term and immediately thereafter.  Some of his troubles were of his own making (Jan. 6).  He doesn’t want a solid conservative, learned and experienced on the law and the Constitution, as Attorney General.  He wants a toady.  No more these principled conservative legal minds such as Bill Barr who couldn’t, for clear lack of evidence, follow him down his imaginary yellow brick road to the land of Stop-the-Steal.  If he gets his way, the rest of us will suffer in the chaotic administration of our – not his – laws.  The same would be true at DNI and HHS.

The “disruptor” schtick belongs in the play pen, not the presidency.  Trump, you don’t have a mandate to do this.  And, Charlie, stop plaguing us with the lickspittle hagiography.  It’s grotesque.

In graphic form, the 2024 election as a vote-against referendum:

May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'RANIRZ 20240GREACAS.COLAEWASHISIO 202 STEEAS TEAASEEVI REVW JOURRAL THE WASHINGTONE TAET FOST 20240 DAKRIS CREATORS. coM BIG GOVERNMENT SOFT Regulations FAR cn OPEN VICTIMHOOD LEFT CRIME BORDEA RAMA 4.0 RAISE PROGRESSINVE TAXES DEFUND 太太太太大地 HOW it olicies EQUITY IT'Sthe ThE EVENPOSSIBLE EVEN CONO 材 LOSE to TRUMP? STUPIL iture NAR POLICE 大 EQUALITY MANDATES BIDEN2.0 EXTREME GREEN TEACHERS UNIONS ONER PARENTS GENDER THEORY DE! IDENTITY POLITICS SPEND BIDENOMICS 島口 PK WAIZ VOTE FILDISIER STER WOKE PRONOUNS TAM ۷ X@Ramireztoons Ramireztoons michaelpramircz.com'

RogerG

Sources:

1. “Charlie Kirk: If John Thune Does Not Fill Trump’s Cabinet In Next 30-45 Days, ‘We Will Remove Him’”, Tyler Stone, RealClear Politics, 11/14/2024, at https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/11/14/charlie_kirk_if_john_thune_does_not_fill_trumps_cabinet_in_next_30-45_days_we_will_remove_him.html

Comments

comments