The Election Was a Rejection of California

May be an image of 1 person
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks on Oct. 7, 2022, in Sacramento, Calif. (photo: Rich Pedroncelli/AP)

Why the focus on California?  Simple, California is the head of the progressive snake.  Its ideological tendencies permeate the national Democratic Party.  Our Vice President, and their losing candidate for president, was politically bred in the specialized, socio-political one-party petri dish of – you guessed it – California.  California Democrat muckety-mucks populate Biden’s executive branch posse with a left coast view of the world.

Let’s take a look at California’s election results to get a hint of the chaos and what could have been in store for the rest of us.  Wait, they aren’t finished counting in the golden state, and won’t be till Dec. 3, maybe not even then.  Speaking of chaos.  The state has turned itself into a model of election incompetence, and the national party has adopted it, seizing the COVID panic as an excuse to nationalize the falderol.  Much vote fraud was legalized, or made easier to go undetected.  Mail-in ballots, election season instead of election day, ballot harvesting, a profusion of provisional ballots, failure to clean voter rolls, and, here’s the kicker, the “curing” of ballots, were pioneered in California.

What’s the “curing”?  “Curing” is how the entrenched party discovers new votes.  First, the state’s Democrat honchos know the state’s blue precincts, for there are many, and target the “curing” on them.  “Curing” refers to seeking out a voter who didn’t properly submit their ballot – missing signature, unmatched signatures, wrong envelope, etc. – and is allowed to correct the mistake (Hmmmm!), and, all of a sudden, a Republican victor on election day wakes up to their loss a couple of weeks later.

Millions of dollars in Democrat war chests exist to fund the cherry-picked treasure hunt.  Gov. Newsom has millions left over from his recall treasury to devote to combing blue precincts for more votes.  Interesting question: Why vote in elections that have more in common with the shams in Maduro’s Venezuela?  California, Californezuela.

If Venezuela’s lefty caudillo, Nicolas Maduro, was California’s governor – no, it’s not as crazy as you think – he’d probably adopt Gov. Newsom’s appropriation of John C. Calhoun.  Remember the nullification crisis of 1832?  South Carolina asserted the power to prevent the enforcement of federal law (the tariff) within the state at the urging of the influential John C. Calhoun.  That’s “nullification”, and blue state fiefdoms in the mold of California have been doing a form of it for decades regarding immigration law.  Newsom doubled down on nullification-lite when he blustered after the election (see #1 below), “The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack [after Trump’s victory] — and we won’t sit idle.”

What freedoms?  The “freedom” to obstruct immigration law by blocking the cooperation of state and local authorities?  The “freedom” of government employees (teachers, administrators) to hide from parents the porn curriculum in third-grade classrooms or the transition of their daughter into a son, all backed up by the Democrat AG Rob Bonta?  The “freedom” of XY “girls” to occupy girls’ spaces and sports?  The “freedom” of the state to undermine out-of-state parenthood by its self-designation as a transgender sanctuary state for minors from anywhere?  The unlimited “freedom” of a woman to end the life of her baby up to the exit from the birth canal, maybe after, who knows?  The “freedom” of the state to force you onto government mass transit or into dopey EVs?  The “freedom” to experience bankrupting utility bills, blackouts, brownouts, and hypothermia after the nuking of nuclear power and fossil fuels?  The “freedom” of the state to be the missing link in the supply chain from ship to shore at its ports by mandating EV 18-wheelers and locomotives, something that doesn’t exist or is impractical beyond measure?  The “freedom” of the state to run you out of business?  The “freedom” to pay more for everything and fewer jobs to accomplish the feat?  The “freedom” to be harassed on everything you say or do, especially religiously?  Thanks, Newsom, for the “freedoms”.

Biden followed the California script.  Biden’s version of fiscal responsibility is additions to the national debt going from $1 trillion every 100 days in 2021 to today’s $1 trillion every 200 days.  Either way, your kids are being robbed.

California is tax-happy and adores the issuance of gobs and gobs and oodles and oodles of bonds.  Propositions 2 and 4 (school building, water/flood/drought projects) on the California ballot appear to be headed for approval. It’s astounding that the state’s current budget of $311 billion and its panoply of taxes, taxes everywhere aren’t enough.  $25 billion in more debt will be added to the outstanding total state bond debt of $79 billion, and more than $1.6 trillion if you combine state and local obligations (see #3).

California pulls out its credit card, and so does Biden/Harris/DNC; only the feds have a much more robust one, one without limit.  They can gin up the money supply by making dollars appear out of thin air.  They’ve got a Federal Reserve.  Thus, they borrowed California’s fiscal philosophy to achieve new heights of inflation.  The old Keynesian adage of spending in bad times and saving in good times was jettisoned.  It’s just the spending now, no need for the saving.  With the pandemic over and recovery well under way in 2021, and Biden filled with delusions of FDR grandeur, the Democrats jumped at the chance by piling $6.17 trillion of new debt onto the backs our kids (see #5).  What did we get for it?  Problems . . . and a few EV chargers.  Sounds like California.

The country became a goat rope in the manner of California.  Every celestial grouping in the radical-left progressive universe was hyped up on taxpayer dollars and deficit spending.  It was enough to make drunken sailors appear judicious.

They were doing everything but the bottom-line function of government’s existence.  Namely, safety and security.  We have a Vice President who personally gave money to bail out rioters, under the euphemism of “protesters”, who were responsible for making hell zones of our metropolitan downtowns.  It did nothing but cause the price for out-bounded U-Hauls to skyrocket.

All kinds of bedlam were celebrated on Capitol Hill and the White House.  Gatherings of the transgendered were held at the White House with participants exuberantly baring their surgical scars and implants to the world and the assembled press.  In the midst of the 2020 riot season and later, the Democrats went full neo-Marxist in Capitol kneelings, calls to defund the police, “reimagining” policing, and full DEI racism.  Hiring practices throughout the executive branch were altered as part of the war on merit.  A candidate for air traffic controller was golden so long as they exhibited the appropriate intersectionality.

As for the border, it became the apex of bedlam.  Not only was the border patrol turned into the Welcome Wagon, but the border jumpers were rewarded with gifts and jet flights to the country’s interior to the chagrin of local officials.  Certainly, in this instance, crime does pay.  And to think that there’s an entire wing of the Democratic Party devoted to California’s favored position on immigration law, which is decriminalization.  They’d like it to be the equivalent of a jaywalking ticket.  Harris, their choice to accelerate the misrule, tried to hide her own calls for California-style immigration chaos but failed.  Chaos, chaos everywhere, from girls’ bathrooms to the border.

This election was a repudiation of the worldview of 60-65% of the California electorate.  The rest of the country rejected the state’s favorite daughter and its approach to governance.  When the donkey party decided to go full California, the rest of the country said, “Whoa, whoa there!  We won’t sign onto a California neo-Marxist revolution.”

There, that’s my take on what happened November 5.

May be an image of 1 person and text

May be an image of text

May be an image of laundromat and text

RogerG

Sources:

1. “‘We won’t sit idle’: Newsom goes on offensive against Trump”, Wes Venteicher, Politico, 11/7/2024, at https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/07/newsom-california-legislative-session-trump-resistance-00188119
2. “2023-24 State Budget”, State of California, at https://ebudget.ca.gov/budget/2023-24EN/#/Home
3. “Overview of State Bond Debt Service”, California Legislative Analyst’s Office, 2/27/2024, at https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/798
4. “California State and Local Liabilities Total $1.6 Trillion”, Edward Ring, California Policy Center, 2/28/2022, at https://californiapolicycenter.org/california-state-and-local-liabilities-total-1-6-trillion/
5. “U.S. debt by president: dollar and percentage 2024”, Annabel Burba in Consumer Affairs, 11/7/2024, at https://www.consumeraffairs.com/finance/us-debt-by-president.html

Comments

comments