The Incoherence of Victor Davis Hanson and His New Right

May be an image of 1 person
Victor Davis Hanson at his home near Selma, Ca.

In Rob Reiner’s “This Is Spinal Tap”, the character of Nigel Tufnel (guitar and vocals in the faux group) divulges their secret in being “one of England’s loudest bands”.  They stenciled their amp dial scales to end at 11 and not the usual 10 – not increase the actual power output, mind you.  Thus, “We go to 11.”  The difference between the regular Right and the most recent edition is that the newest vintage will “go to 11”, always on the lookout for new opportunities to be loco.

May be an image of 3 people and guitar

May be an image of text

May be an image of 2 people, crowd and text
Trump supporters swarm Washington, D.C., Nov. 2020

The New Right is content with the batty isolationism-lite, the battle against those mysterious and formless “neocons” and the “establishment”, and a zeal for protectionist tariffs.  Their political darling is Donald Trump and prominent mouthpiece in the academy is Victor Davis Hanson.  Hanson has twisted his intellect into knots to turn Trumpian incoherence into coherence.  The old wisecrack “Give him enough rope and he will hang himself” could be rejiggered to apply to Hanson in “Let him talk long enough and reasonableness is overtaken by bunk”.

It was on full display in the October 26 podcast of the “The Victor Davis Hanson Show”. Hanson loves the term “reestablish deterrence”.  I do too. In a dangerous world, bad actors need to understand that they’ll pay a heavy price for harming you: “If you want peace, prepare for war.”  But it’s strange to the point of incredulity to apply it to only two of the three theaters of Cold War II: Israel and the Middle East, yes, of course; Taiwan/CCP/South China Sea, yes, of course; but Ukraine/Putin/Russia, no.  What’s with that?

For Hanson, “reestablish deterrence” somehow stops when considering Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.  Hanson’s logic is a ball of confusion.  He blathers about the “scared soil of Mother Russia” as quicksand for Ukraine and their supporters in order to justify a replay of 1967’s Vietnam War micromanagement when then-president LBJ chose bombing targets in North Vietnam and restricted efforts to destroy the Ho Chi Minh Trail and clean out NVA and Viet Cong sanctuaries in Cambodia.  According to Hanson, we should not be supplying offensive weapons nor should Ukraine in any way, no matter how modified, adopt the tactics of the invader.  Is there at least a hint of inconsistency here?  Hypocrisy?

Weapons are weapons, whether labeled “offensive” or “defensive”.  Is it “offensive” to strike Russian airbases, supply depots, missile sites, command-and-control centers, or occupy areas near Ukraine’s borders that are essential to keep Russia’s murderous juggernaut rampaging in Ukraine well-supplied?  That’s defensive, Victor!

For Hanson, “reestablish deterrence” only applies against Iran or the CCP.  How does Putin deserve a free pass?  It’s the strangest thing.  Putin’s desire to resurrect the Soviet empire is somehow different in Hanson’s mind from the mullah’s ambition to bring back the caliphate over the bodies of millions of Israelis or Xi’s craving to rebuild the Middle Kingdom of earth.  Putin is decimating Ukraine as Iran would like to see done to Israel.  Instead, Hanson strays off into a gripping fear of stepping onto the “sacred soil of Russia”.  No word about the “scared soil of Ukraine”.

Try to make sense of it.  You can’t.  Emotions must account for it.  Angers, resentments could be swamping the brain.  Col. Vidman is Ukrainian and testified against Trump.  Hanson must have been grinding his teeth.  (Honestly, me too!)  Zelensky visits an American factory that’s viewed favorably for Biden and Harris.  The Left hates Russia for magically electing Trump; therefore, the Right automatically loves the place.  Putin, manly man, versus XY “girls” and XX “boys” regaled at the White House.  The faculty lounge flies Ukrainian flags at their homes while blue-collars languish in joblessness and meth.  Hanson is seething.

Hanson tries to use the national debt and an open border as an excuse not to have a foreign policy, at least one that makes some sense.  He’s actually saying, until all our problems are solved, to hell with Ukraine and foreign affairs.  We’ve done it before regarding the continent of Europe, circa the 1930s prior to the fall of France, Pearl Harbor, and the Holocaust.  It’s a theater of the absurd, and Hanson is begging to play a key role in the sordid drama.

May be an illustration of text

RogerG

Comments

comments